<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: January</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/robertsharp/2007/02/19/january/</link>
	<description>These are the films I watch each week on DVD and at the cinema</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John Weddell</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/robertsharp/2007/02/19/january/#comment-2</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/robertsharp/2007/02/19/january/#comment-2</guid>
					<description>Very nice article, best exemplified by your observation about the Fifth Element, I think. 
I even find the bits where I disagree with you interesting, rare as they are, and you've made me want to watch those films you list, some of which (The Fourth Man, Short Cuts The Conformist, The Color of Money) are favourites of mine, again. 
Which is what good film writing should do to the reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article, best exemplified by your observation about the Fifth Element, I think.<br />
I even find the bits where I disagree with you interesting, rare as they are, and you&#8217;ve made me want to watch those films you list, some of which (The Fourth Man, Short Cuts The Conformist, The Color of Money) are favourites of mine, again.<br />
Which is what good film writing should do to the reader.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
