“The concept of ‘obscenity’ is tested when we dare to look at something that we desire to see but have forbidden ourselves to look at. When we feel that everything has been revealed, ‘obscenity’ disappears and there is a certain liberation. When that which one had wanted to see isn’t sufficiently revealed, however, the taboo remains, the feeling of ‘obscenity’ stays, and an even greater ‘obscenity’ comes into being. Pornographic films are thus a testing ground for ‘obscenity’, and the benefits of pornography are clear. Pornographic cinema should be authorised, immediately and completely. Only thus can ‘obscenity’ be rendered essentially meaningless.”
Nagisa Oshima, from ‘Theory of Experimental Pornographic Film’ (1976)
“It is my dream, it is my goal, it is my idea, to make a film that the story just sucks ‘em in, and when they spurt out that joy juice, they just gotta sit in it, they can’t move until they find out how the story ends.“
Mike Horner, Boogie Nights (1997)
This is an article about mainstream films with unsimulated sex scenes, so if this is a subject in which you have no interest, you’re allowed to leave early. If however, you’re prepared to stay the course, please feel free to open the Official In the Realm of the Senses Spotify playlist below, cue up Donna Summer, and we’ll begin.
http://open.spotify.com/user/robertsharp/playlist/1iThAMbtlZVtwJ8fGCvkpY
How significant is it that after the development of a new form of media, it is more commonly pornography that becomes a driving force in its adoption? This goes back to paintings on the walls of caves, ancient fertility symbols and the mosaics of Pompeii. After Caxton printed the Bible, should we be surprised that printed woodcuts of people having sex were soon to follow?
So it is with photography. So it is with cinema. One of the earliest surviving examples of early cinema is a short film in which a man has found a woman willing to undress in front of a motion picture camera. The recent French compilation, The Good Old Naughty Days (2002), brings together a group of early pornographic scenes originally intended to be screened in French brothels. The films are populated possibly by the very prostitutes of the brothels that showed the films; the men are disguised very poorly behind fake moustaches and bad wigs; and, in advance loving tribute to the dialogue of Shakespeare in Love (1998), there is even “a bit with a dog”.
The status of the pornographic film remains resolutely underground throughout the 20th Century until the 1970s. The majority of the product at the time consisted of very short films known as loops, mostly shot on 8mm in anonymous motels and clandestine destinations, mostly shown at stag nights or accessed via subterranean connections in the backs of dubious magazines, or friends of friends, or friends of friends of friends. Due to its illegality, organised crime became involved in providing finance and reaping the profits.
It isn’t until the liberalisation of the MPAA in 1968 and the introduction of the X certificate that something starts to shift in film culture. Denmark becomes the first country to legalise hardcore pornography in 1969. Respectable filmmakers, such as John Schlesinger with Midnight Cowboy (1969), produce films with tough content, rated X, but still able to compete for and win Oscars. In certain quarters, the liberating effects of the 1960s create a climate in which America, for a brief moment, is willing to step up a year or two in its always problematic adolescence of sexuality. The X certificate meant adults only; more permissive legislation was passed; metropolitan audiences were willing to attend X rated films; organised crime was ready to finance the brief era of porno chic, in which educated liberals would test their audiovisual boundaries by seeing Deep Throat (1972).
Deep Throat (1972)
Well it certainly doesn’t look like a cultural phenomenon 37 years after the fact; instead, it looks like what it is - a poverty row cheapie filmed in twelve days (six days filming, six days waiting for the sun to come out, as Linda Boreman states in Ordeal) at an anonymous motel somewhere on Biscayne Boulevard in Miami, Florida. The plot of Deep Throat is disposed of within the first half hour with the introduction of the classic porn trope: a woman in search of her first orgasm (an idea which will be revisited in Shortbus (2006) below - I should mention here the sense I’ve had watching all five of these films in a concentrated burst; that each filmmaker has seen all of these films as well, so that Oshima could not have embarked on Ai No Corrida (1976) without seeing Deep Throat; that John Cameron Mitchell names the Shortbus vibrating egg In the Realm of the Senses in tribute to Oshima’s film, and so on).
The odd thing about Deep Throat is how much it resembles all the ineptly made pornography that has trailed in its wake: the unadventurous camerawork, sledgehammer editing, poor lighting, awful dialogue, bad acting, irritating music, closeup gynaecology, etc. As if all of these things can be excused by the fact that the cast engage in sex with each other for real. Even this early in the hardcore genre, the film looks played out and derivative instead of innovative and daring, a creative dead end instead of the new set of clichés it should be. Linda Boreman can’t act for toffee and delivers a flat, toneless performance that will inspire Julianne Moore’s flat, toneless porn film acting in Boogie Nights (1997) 25 years later. Harry Reems offers the other porn film acting choice: he overacts with a bad English accent for no reason at all. Overacting as a doctor, he makes a unique medical breakthrough with the aid of what looks suspiciously like a novelty telescope and discovers why Linda Lovelace has been unable to have an orgasm: her clitoris is located in her throat. This leads to Linda’s first orgasm (and much intercut clanging of bells and launching of rockets *rolls eyes*) via a demonstration of the ‘sword-swallowing’ fellatio technique taught to Linda by Chuck Traynor, who was at the time of Deep Throat’s production Linda Boreman’s boyfriend, manager, pimp and domestic abuser.
After the first day’s shooting on the film, Traynor was so outraged by Linda’s behaviour on set (she was smiling at people, enjoying her work, and expressing relief at being out from under Traynor’s control) that he attacked her so violently that the bruises can be seen on her legs in an early scene near the pool, the abuse visible across the years as a reminder that though the world of porn likes to present itself with an upbeat face, there are sometimes emotionally damaging reasons why these individuals have found their way to this world, or been coerced into this world, or forced into this world, or forced to have sex with a dog at gunpoint, or forced to urinate on another woman at gunpoint, both of which happened to Linda Boreman during her time with Chuck Traynor. Interestingly, although Boreman became an ardent campaigner against pornography in later life, she remembers her brief time making Deep Throat with a certain amount of fondness; after the first day’s beating, the director, Gerard Damiano, took Traynor aside and conveyed to him the fact that he should leave Linda alone for the rest of the shoot, or the film’s producer may want to have some words with him, and since the film’s producer was a Mafioso, Traynor took the hint and stifled his abuse of Linda for a couple of weeks. No one knows how much Deep Throat made at the box office for the modest outlay of its $22,000 budget, but all of that money, and it numbers in at least the tens of millions of dollars, ended up in the hands of the Mafia.
As lifeless as Linda Boreman is in the dialogue scenes, as Linda Lovelace in the sex scenes, she comes to life, and demonstrates what would become another porn trope: porn stars act best when they’re having sex. However, the sex in Deep Throat in relentlessly unsexy, scored by bad pop music overlaid with endless bubble sound effects for no reason at all, and the novelty of the sword-swallowing fellatio quickly grows old. Deep Throat doesn’t have any content away from the sex, and that is why Nagisa Oshima could see that more was possible; if you could surround the sex scenes with proper filmmaking, you could forge new ground in unexplored territory, and this must have seemed terribly appealing to Oshima, a filmmaker in the John Huston mould who doesn’t like to repeat himself from film to film.
(Sources [all books]: Inside Linda Lovelace (1974) by Linda Lovelace (ie. Chuck Traynor); Ordeal (1980) by Linda Lovelace with Mike McGrady; The Other Hollywood: The Uncensored Oral History of the Porn Film Industry (2005) by Legs McNeil & Jennifer Osborne with Peter Pravia)
The success of Deep Throat was followed by a number of other high profile porn films, among them Behind the Green Door (1972) with Marilyn Chambers, Devil in Miss Jones (1973) with Georgina Spelvin, and Debbie Does Dallas (1978) with Bambi Woods, one of those films that can’t be as good as its title (it isn’t). Infamous male porn star John Holmes also rises to prominence at this time. And that was essentially game over for mainstream filmmakers wanting to make films rated X for content, not just rated X because they contained scenes of unsimulated sex; the certificate had been permanently stolen by hardcore pornography, no newspaper would carry adverts for X rated films, and few cinema owners would book them onto their screens. (This situation remains in place today - the introduction of the NC-17 certificate for Henry & June (1990) did little or nothing to change the situation - and often the only option for filmmakers has been to release their films unrated by the MPAA, though few newspapers will carry ads for unrated or NC-17 films, and few cinema owners will book them.)
It is in this cultural arena that a respectable Japanese filmmaker, Nagisa Oshima, decides that his next film, Ai No Corrida (1976), will contain scenes of unsimulated sex which won’t be the film’s be-all and end-all. Rather, the scenes will be as important in plot, character and symbolic terms as any other scene in the film. Japanese cultural censorship rules forbid the showing of pubic hair in cinema films, so unsimulated sex was never going to be welcomed with open arms. The French producer of the film, Anatole Dauman, had been inspired by the American success of early 1970s hardcore pornographic films to propose a similar project to Oshima in 1972, and after mulling it over for a few years, both Oshima and Dauman were able to agree on a deal. Although the film was made in Japan with a Japanese crew, the negative had to be smuggled out of the country and processed and edited in France. To this day, the uncut version of the film recently released by The Criterion Collection has never been shown in Japan. Legally, at least.
Ai No Corrida (1976)
Based on a well-documented incident in Japanese history from 1936 where a woman named Sada Abe was found wandering the streets with the severed penis of her dead lover, Kichizo Ishida, Oshima’s film fills in the backstory of this incident from a number of accounts, but then ups the ante over previous film versions by committing to a portrayal of the lovers’ couplings without simulation.
Filming on a closed set allows Oshima to create a closed private world in which the couplings of the lovers act as a rejection of society and the growing militarism of the time as Japan geared up for its expansion into China and its participation in the Second World War. This rejection is a defiant expression of personal freedom and leads to the creation of, in the words of lead actor, Tatsuya Fuji, “an absolute realm that doesn’t recognise others’ judgements or conventional morality”. In short, in order for the film to be what it is, there is no choice available other than to play the sex scenes for real, because without this commitment, the film would be unable to transcend its subject matter and break the longstanding sexual taboos of Japanese culture. Without real sex, the film could be dismissed as just another “pink” film (“pink” is a sex film category in Japan that emerged in the 1960s that stays within Japanese sexual taboos: no pubic hair, no genitalia, no real sex). Oshima has no interest in being dismissed, he wants to break taboos he regards as unhealthy, and ultimately he failed in life but not in film.
The actors are extraordinary, particularly the intensity Eiko Matsuda brings to the role of Sada Abe, a woman with a past obsessed with knives and acts of violence. The film takes its time, often holding shots for minutes on end, often resembling sexually explicit art from earlier periods of Japanese history, often observing the action like a voyeur, often from the viewpoint of an onscreen voyeur. The film knows you want to watch it, knows why you’re there, but is prepared to take you on an arc of voyeurism and intrusion into a hitherto private sphere designed to make you feel uncomfortable as slapping, choking and strangling come to dominate the couplings and the film heads to its inevitable conclusion and my least favourite cinematic sight: the severing of an onscreen penis. Sada Abe became a hero to Japanese feminists as a result of this act; she had turned the lover who’d initially seduced her into a willing provider of her orgasms - it is no coincidence that the Sada Abe character starts the film in the missionary position and ends the film on top, dominating her counterpart as she strangles him to prolong their mutual pleasure.
These are not effects films like Deep Throat (1972) can ever hope to achieve. Oshima brings proper filmmakng skills to Ai No Corrida, and initiates a new undefined genre of cinema, but one that would take time to gather other members to its fold.
(Source: The extras on The Criterion Collection’s US DVD release of Ai No Corrida)
The rise of video sees off whatever ambitions the makers of hardcore pornography had as filmmakers (if they ever had any in the first place), and the American genre of hardcore pornography settles into a familiar pattern of VHS tapes which contain scenes of unsimulated sex separated by scenes of bad acting that could now be fast-forwarded through. If there ever was any artistic ambition in the genre, it had been firmly ejected from the moneymaking process. Porn films would become known for the campness of their reappropriation of mainstream film titles and styles (or what style could be done on video with minimal editing and zero budget) and their willingness - perhaps unknowingly, perhaps not - to exploit vulnerable, underage girls like Traci Lords, or, indeed, exploit vulnerable adults of legal age with chaotic, abusive family backgrounds.
The next 20 years in mainstream film see only the occasional unsimulated sex sequence. For example, producer and owner of Penthouse, Bob Guccione, secretly films hardcore inserts for Caligula (1979), detonating lawsuits left, right and centre from which the film itself, never properly edited to completion by its original director, Tinto Brass, never recovers. Paul Verhoeven, a stickler for authenticity, hires two male prostitutes to engage in a brief onscreen fellatio scene to add some local colour to Spetters (1980). Respected Dutch actress, Maruschka Detmers, performs fellatio on co-star Federico Pitzalis in Marco Bellocchio’s Devil in the Flesh (1986).
These seem pretty much like one-off, every now and then aberrations until The Idiots (1998), when Lars Von Trier, freshly armed with the Dogme Manifesto and always a provocateur, turns unsimulated sex into an arthouse strategy in opposition to mainstream Hollywood filmmaking with its enormous budgets and CGI special effects. The thinking goes that a European arthouse filmmaker can put on screen what no Hollywood filmmaker would be allowed to: real actors having sex for real, and that this can be a way of drawing audiences to arthouse films as a way of giving them something they can’t get from Hollywood films, but also can’t get from pornography, since pornography is all about the sex not the acting, but arthouse cinema with unsimulated sex scenes can be all about the acting (and filmmaking) as well as the sex. Alongside this in 1998, Von Trier’s mainstream production company, Zentropa, also started financing female-friendly, hardcore pornographic films, intended to be viewed by couples, perhaps the best known example of which is All About Anna (2005).
Though The Idiots only contains about 3 seconds of unsimulated sex during an orgy sequence and an actor with an erection in a shower, these were enough to cause disquiet when the film was screened on the UK’s Channel 4 in 2005 as part of a censorship season; in the end, common sense prevailed, Channel 4 were allowed to broadcast the film uncut, and Ofcom backed the decision against whatever protestations had been made.
One of the first responses to the challenge laid down by The Idiots was Catherine Breillat’s Romance (1999). Breillat is a Frenchwoman with a longstanding interest in sexuality and relationships, as demonstrated by Une Vraie Jeune Fille (1976), banned in France after its initial premiere until 1999, and 36 Fillette (1988), which was retitled in England as Virgin, a decision which surprised Breillat. It would be good to report that Romance is worth seeing, but I found the film’s basic premise absurd. The setup is that Marie (Caroline Ducey) is so unhappy that her boyfriend Paul (Sagamore Stévenin) won’t have sex with her (for no particular reason other than that he is French and full of inarticulate angst), that she decides to embark on a series of sexual encounters with perfect strangers, amongst them notorious Italian porn star, Rocco Siffredi, in the hope she can change his mind. Instead of just dumping the loser, of course, like anyone other than a Frenchwoman would.
Baise-Moi (2000)
“This here’s the future. Videotape tells the truth.”
Floyd Gondolli, Boogie Nights (1997)
Who mourns for Karine Bach? She committed suicide by overdose in January 2005 at the age of 32, but she was better known as Karen Lancaume, a French porn star who quit the business in 1999, but was persuaded halfway back to see off her porn past for good by Virginie Despentes, author of the original 1993 novel, and Coralie Trinh Thi, a fellow ex-porn star, both of whom would serve as first time directors on an ultra-low budget, punk rock Thelma & Louise (1991) ripoff shot on video in natural light to keep costs down.
I say video, but it seems more like the cheapest, most horrible looking, dingiest video camera anyone could find. And it gets taken to the most awful looking places, from the nasty warehouse where one of the leads and a friend are raped to the tacky sex club near the end. Though the grunginess of the film’s look is neatly counterbalanced by the slickness of the editing. Unsurprisingly, there was some resistance to casting two ex-porn stars in the lead roles (what? Ludivine Sagnier and Romane Bohringer were unavailable?) but Karine Bach and Raffaëlla Anderson acquit themselves better than well: one of the secrets of film acting is the ability to just be real in front of the camera, and Bach and Anderson have no trouble with this.
They play two women, Nadine and Manu - both trapped in a desolate urban environment inhabited by male lowlifes, scumbags, drug dealers and rapists (that you hope was nothing like anybody’s real life, but you fear may well be), both are pushed to the limits by a roommate and a partner that they respectively kill. The two meet in a Métro station and recognise an indefinable quality in the other that draws them together in friendship and sets them off on an angry crime spree odyssey of for real sex and brutal violence that has tragic but weirdly symbolic consequences. I wonder whether Virginie and Coralie know that the seas and lakes that Nadine and Manu are drawn to are symbols of the feminine, symbols of the unconscious, symbols of the creation of life, symbols of the storms and chaos that lie beneath everyday reality, symbols of the feelings these characters have given vent to with such venom and enthusiasm. I like to think so. I like to think that these are deliberate choices. For ultimately, it isn’t the unsimulated sex and bloody violence that makes Baise-Moi my favourite of the films considered here, it’s this fascinating, almost spiritual layer that I find so rich and compelling.
Who mourns for Karine Bach? I do. She could genuinely act and inhabit a role like most porn stars can’t. But did she have ambitions to make it as a mainstream actress, or were her ambitions denied by a conservative filmmaking culture in France? Did she kill herself because she wasn’t allowed out of the porn ghetto? Because the money was running out? Because she was addicted to drugs? Because she reached a point of despair in her life few of us will ever know?
I don’t know any of these things. All I know is that Karine Bach is dead by her own hand, and I mourn for her. Her death doesn’t seem right somehow. Strange, eh?
(Source: The extras on Universal’s UK DVD release of Baise-Moi)
In the wake of these films, the belief emerged that sooner or later an English-speaking film would attempt to incorporate scenes of unsimulated sex into a conventional narrative. In reality, it happened ahead of schedule with the release of Intimacy (2001), which featured one scene of onscreen fellatio between New Zealand actress, Kerry Fox, and Mark Rylance, who was at the time the Artistic Director of Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre in London.
In the wake of this film, with the English language barrier breached, the belief emerged that sooner or later an English-speaking film made in America would attempt to incorporate scenes of unsimulated sex featuring established Hollywood actors into a conventional narrative. In reality, it happened ahead of schedule with the release of The Brown Bunny (2003), which featured one scene of onscreen fellatio between free-spirited New York actress, Chloë Sevigny, and Vincent Gallo, an irascible egotist who did everything on the film except make the tea, and he probably made that as well, though against his will and not in a good mood, which seems to be Gallo’s default setting.
In marked contrast to Traci Lords’ attempts to make it as a mainstream actress a dozen years earlier (Lords found herself relegated to walk-ons in mainstream studio pics like Cry-Baby (1990) and Blade (1998) and only allowed to play leads in B-movies and straight-to-DVD potboilers - the shame of it is that Lords can really act, but her notoreity frightens risk-averse Hollywood executives), The Brown Bunny had little or no effect on Sevigny’s career. Her agents at the time of the film decided they could no longer represent her, but she found new agents quickly and delivered a terrific performance in David Fincher’s Zodiac (2007), amongst others. This is the first time that participation in an unsimulated sex scene by an American actress (arthouse or pornography) has had no long term ill effects, and its importance should not be underestimated. I’ve no desire to see The Brown Bunny, because on all accounts, it is a poor, one man band vanity project with a for-real sex scene towards the end and little else; how strange that it may turn out to be of some wider cultural significance while being void of any artistic value.
All through this time, the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) was undergoing a process of change and reassessment in the wake of the departure of James Ferman in 1999. The Board started to take a more reasonable stance in regard to scenes of unsimulated sex and the boundaries of what could be passed uncut with an 18 certificate slowly began to be relaxed after years of rigidity and a secretive lack of clarity. Thus we come to the question of male ejaculation. A scene containing this unsimulated act was cut from the French film, Le Pornographe (2001), much to the disgust of the film’s UK distrbutor, Hamish McAlpine, whose response was to issue the film cut by 11 seconds on DVD but uncut as a R18 video which could only be sold in licensed sex shops. It would appear that the BBFC needed a line to draw in the sand between acceptable and unacceptable with an 18 certificate, and male ejaculation was it. It was somewhat of a surprise then when 3 years later, Michael Winterbottom’s 9 Songs (2004) was released with its male ejaculation scene intact. It’s in a discreet long shot, but it wasn’t that discreet projected on a large cinema screen. The BBFC had changed its mind and redrawn the line in the sand.
9 Songs (2004)
At the time of the film’s release, critic Mark Kermode speculated that porn producers would soon be packing their bags for colder climes to film moody snowscapes or setting off to the nearest festival to shoot some live band footage with the intention of integrating this material into their run of the mill hardcore footage so as to be able to get the end product passed as 18 by the BBFC rather than having to accept a R18 and ghettoisation in licensed sex shops. As far as I know, this has not happened. The reason it hasn’t happened should be obvious: hanging out on Norwegian glaciers or at Glastonbury is going to be horrendously expensive and eat into the profits a porn film producer can make from filming people having sex for real, a venture that by comparison is relatively inexpensive. And besides, would such a transparent strategy fool anyone at the BBFC? Not likely.
Better filmmakers make the scenes between the sex work as well as the sex. And Michael Winterbottom is a better filmmaker than any porn film producer will ever be. His motive for the film was “Why not?” Margo Stilley’s motivation to act in the film was, “I thought it needed to be done.” In these joint aims can be detected the intentions of Nagisa Oshima in 1976.
9 Songs chronicles a relationship that’s been over for months but instead of following that relationship as it falls apart and focusing on the emotional trauma that results [recent example: Revolutionary Road (2008)], it only chronicles the relationship through sex and concert visits, only hinting at why the relationship ended, perhaps suggesting that it was doomed from the start, suggesting that though the relationship had sex, what it lacked was intimacy, and when Margo Stilley’s character began to reach orgasm without her partner (and not attending concerts!), she was already mentally packing her bags to head back to the States.
Video gives the filmmakers flexibility and freedom, but that unlit look is also a dour look, and though the participants sound as if they’re enjoying themselves, they don’t sound like they’re having fun.
(Source: The extras on Optimum’s UK DVD release of 9 Songs)
It may have been at about this time that there emerged criticism of the arthouse unsimulated sex movement (if such a movement can be so discerned) that a lot of this sexual activity seemed joyless, gloomy, desperate, uncomfortable, and decidedly not fun. Fortunately, American filmmaker John Cameron Mitchell, who’d had some minor success with the fun transgender rock musical Hedwig and the Angry Inch (2001), had recognised this as well and spent three years in production before turning up with Shortbus (2006), an English language film shot in America, a comedy in the style of Woody Allen (70s model) that returns to the quest of Deep Throat (1972), the search for the female orgasm.
Shortbus (2006)
“It’s just like the 60s, only with less hope.”
Justin Bond, Shortbus (2006)
Who knew that there was a yoga position a man could adopt that would allow him to ejaculate on his own face? (It’s a symbol of the self-loathing and sexual confusion of this character as a result of his refusal to be penetrated by his male lover.) Who knew that there was an actor willing to adopt that yoga position and then allow himself to be filmed ejaculating on his own face? And that it required several attempts over a number of months because the lighting wasn’t sufficiently revealing of the semen?
Well I know now, and thankfully I didn’t buy this film by mistake in a 4 for £20 deal at HMV thinking it was another light-hearted romantic comedy, though I’m sure someone will. Aren’t they in for a surprise? And aren’t we all, because Shortbus is a light-hearted romantic comedy but with added unsimulated sex. Following the lead of the opening 20 minutes of Moulin Rouge (2000), which basically says to the audience this is what this film is going to be like so if you don’t want to take the ride, now would be a good time to leave the theatre, Shortbus takes a similar route. The opening 10 minutes are all about the sex, throwing down the gauntlet and announcing itself with authority. There’s a particularly good joke at the expense of Jackson Pollock’s contribution to Abstract Expressionism which I shall not spoil by revealing here, but I bet you can guess what it is, can’t you? That’s right.
Sofia is a sex therapist who’s never had an orgasm, Jamie and James are feeling the need to open up their relationship to a third party, and Severin is a dominatrix who can’t connect emotionally with anyone (possibly because she spends her working life beating people with whips and leading them around on a chain). They have a place in common, though, the Shortbus salon of the title presided over by Justin Bond, where neurotic intellectual self-obsessed New York liberals meet to see films, drink, eat, socialise and have sex with each other. This is one of those films that Woody Allen never quite got around to making, and a lot of it is awfully funny, especially the Star Spangled Banner sequence that is beyond my ability to describe.
The couplings in Shortbus are also deliberately well-lit. Writer-director John Cameron Mitchell refuses to cloak the sex in darkness and uses the sex positively rather than portraying it in a negative light. As the film goes on, it retreats from its opening salvo of genitalia and becomes more intimate, concentrating on the emotional connections between people’s faces rather than between their legs. It also draws from real life events and uses the power brownouts that followed in the wake of 9./11 to recreate the sense of community in New York that was rekindled when the lights went out. Naturally enough, the lights return when Sofia has her first orgasm; in her dedication to the cause, actress Sook-Yin Lee was locked in a cupboard with a camera and brought herself to orgasm many times over.
(Source: The extras on Universal’s UK DVD release of Shortbus)
One of the strategies employed by these disparate filmmakers is to make their movies genre movies instead of pornographic movies. Ai No Corrida is a historical drama, Baise-Moi is a crime thriller, 9 Songs is a musical, and Shortbus is a romantic comedy. And they are these things first and foremost, they just also happen to contain scenes of unsimulated sex.
This then is where we are in 2009: there are now so many of these films that they constitute a genre all by themselves, something fresh and new that has not existed in film before, and nobody knows where it will lead.