<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gummo</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/</link>
	<description>The Darkest Corner of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: paulwjm</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3105</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3105</guid>
					<description>Yes, the girl appears to be disabled in some way.  Obviously if that was Korine's response then he'd deserve any negative attention he got.  Without substantiation though I suppose it's better to assume innocence until evidence of some kind materialises.  We have little or no idea what goes on behind the scenes of these films and in this case I take Gummo purely on face value in contextual terms of cinema.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the girl appears to be disabled in some way.  Obviously if that was Korine&#8217;s response then he&#8217;d deserve any negative attention he got.  Without substantiation though I suppose it&#8217;s better to assume innocence until evidence of some kind materialises.  We have little or no idea what goes on behind the scenes of these films and in this case I take Gummo purely on face value in contextual terms of cinema.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: anephric</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3097</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3097</guid>
					<description>Iirc, the scene where the girl shaves off her eyebrows was the subject of much criticism, I think because the girl is evidentally disabled?  I don't remember it that well.  The gist was that Korine had forced her into doing it, photographed it and it was just like laughing at a gimp in a sideshow.  I have no idea of the truth of that criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iirc, the scene where the girl shaves off her eyebrows was the subject of much criticism, I think because the girl is evidentally disabled?  I don&#8217;t remember it that well.  The gist was that Korine had forced her into doing it, photographed it and it was just like laughing at a gimp in a sideshow.  I have no idea of the truth of that criticism.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: paulwjm</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3090</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3090</guid>
					<description>First time I saw this was around 2000 so I missed any controversy that may have occurred around the release date - certainly don't recall hearing anything about it.
I don't personally consider it poking a stick at something but I suppose you can take the intentions of a director who makes such material as this in various ways. I understand he came from a similar sort of background himself. It's certainly exploitative but that's only due to the nature of this kind of lifestyle being highlighted - that is, if you're going to document material such as this cinematically it would be difficult or impossible to do it justly in such a way that it wouldn't be considered exploitative. I see it as a particularly honest, insightful, and perceptive look at a side of life that many of us might otherwise have been ignorant to, either involuntarily or voluntarily depending on the person.

I'm glad someone else out there has seen this one though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First time I saw this was around 2000 so I missed any controversy that may have occurred around the release date - certainly don&#8217;t recall hearing anything about it.<br />
I don&#8217;t personally consider it poking a stick at something but I suppose you can take the intentions of a director who makes such material as this in various ways. I understand he came from a similar sort of background himself. It&#8217;s certainly exploitative but that&#8217;s only due to the nature of this kind of lifestyle being highlighted - that is, if you&#8217;re going to document material such as this cinematically it would be difficult or impossible to do it justly in such a way that it wouldn&#8217;t be considered exploitative. I see it as a particularly honest, insightful, and perceptive look at a side of life that many of us might otherwise have been ignorant to, either involuntarily or voluntarily depending on the person.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad someone else out there has seen this one though!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: anephric</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3089</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/04/05/gummo/#comment-3089</guid>
					<description>Gummo was very controversial when it was released (I remember seeing it theatrically).  Korine got accused of all kinds of exploitation, some of it I agree with, and came off (at the time) as a particularly purulent adolescent intent on shocking anyone who would look or listen.  

Gummo has some memorable scenes and imagery, but I'm not sure it's in aid of anything other than poking a stick at a particularly vulnerable underbelly.  It's a celebration and an exploitation, which left a lot of people uncomfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gummo was very controversial when it was released (I remember seeing it theatrically).  Korine got accused of all kinds of exploitation, some of it I agree with, and came off (at the time) as a particularly purulent adolescent intent on shocking anyone who would look or listen.  </p>
<p>Gummo has some memorable scenes and imagery, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s in aid of anything other than poking a stick at a particularly vulnerable underbelly.  It&#8217;s a celebration and an exploitation, which left a lot of people uncomfortable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
