<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003)</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/03/20/texas-chainsaw-massacre-2003/</link>
	<description>The Darkest Corner of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: paulwjm</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/03/20/texas-chainsaw-massacre-2003/#comment-3018</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/03/20/texas-chainsaw-massacre-2003/#comment-3018</guid>
					<description>Nice points, Dan.  I felt the same applied to Exorcist just as you did - I saw it a couple of times at the cinema during its late nineties revival and thanks to a disrespectful audience I ended up not wanting to watch it again for about 5 years or so.  Thankfully the wonders of DVD and home cinema projection make it possible to truly enjoy this film as it's supposed to be experienced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice points, Dan.  I felt the same applied to Exorcist just as you did - I saw it a couple of times at the cinema during its late nineties revival and thanks to a disrespectful audience I ended up not wanting to watch it again for about 5 years or so.  Thankfully the wonders of DVD and home cinema projection make it possible to truly enjoy this film as it&#8217;s supposed to be experienced.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Stephens</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/03/20/texas-chainsaw-massacre-2003/#comment-3017</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/03/20/texas-chainsaw-massacre-2003/#comment-3017</guid>
					<description>I think The Exorcist suffered from the same sort of 'self-erected barriers'. I didn't see the film until after it had been deemed 'safe', and its run in cinemas had concluded. Eventually, when I finally watched the film upon its DVD release I saw what all the fuss was about. It's not only a great horror film but one of the best films ever made...if not, the best. But it was seen by a new generation who had preconceived ideas about it from its reputation and I think in many ways that's what killed it in those who declare it isn't effective, or well-made, or even frightening. Then again it could be just down to the fact some adults won't admit to a film scaring them. I still have yet to watch The Exorcist on my own!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think The Exorcist suffered from the same sort of &#8217;self-erected barriers&#8217;. I didn&#8217;t see the film until after it had been deemed &#8217;safe&#8217;, and its run in cinemas had concluded. Eventually, when I finally watched the film upon its DVD release I saw what all the fuss was about. It&#8217;s not only a great horror film but one of the best films ever made&#8230;if not, the best. But it was seen by a new generation who had preconceived ideas about it from its reputation and I think in many ways that&#8217;s what killed it in those who declare it isn&#8217;t effective, or well-made, or even frightening. Then again it could be just down to the fact some adults won&#8217;t admit to a film scaring them. I still have yet to watch The Exorcist on my own!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: anephric</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/03/20/texas-chainsaw-massacre-2003/#comment-3013</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/03/20/texas-chainsaw-massacre-2003/#comment-3013</guid>
					<description>Although competently made, I just saw no point at all in this remake; it's slick and glossy and cosmetic where the original is rough and grim and wild; things like Harry Knowles' cameo are far more horrific than anything the filmmakers can throw at you.

I haven't seen the follow up - life's too short for more crap TCM cash-ins.  I've seen Next Generation (or whatever it's called).  That was enough.

TCM and the gleefully contrary-to-expectations TCM 2 are all anyone will ever need, tbh.  Maybe if New Line hadn't have got cold feet and slashed away at Jeff Burr's cut of Leatherface then that might be worth a damn too (and even then, from what I've seen, his workprint was still miles removed from Dave Schow's incredibly grotesque original screenplay).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although competently made, I just saw no point at all in this remake; it&#8217;s slick and glossy and cosmetic where the original is rough and grim and wild; things like Harry Knowles&#8217; cameo are far more horrific than anything the filmmakers can throw at you.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the follow up - life&#8217;s too short for more crap TCM cash-ins.  I&#8217;ve seen Next Generation (or whatever it&#8217;s called).  That was enough.</p>
<p>TCM and the gleefully contrary-to-expectations TCM 2 are all anyone will ever need, tbh.  Maybe if New Line hadn&#8217;t have got cold feet and slashed away at Jeff Burr&#8217;s cut of Leatherface then that might be worth a damn too (and even then, from what I&#8217;ve seen, his workprint was still miles removed from Dave Schow&#8217;s incredibly grotesque original screenplay).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
