<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Son of Frankenstein</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/02/05/son-of-frankenstein/</link>
	<description>The Darkest Corner of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: paulwjm</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/02/05/son-of-frankenstein/#comment-2647</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/02/05/son-of-frankenstein/#comment-2647</guid>
					<description>Believe it or not, Livius, I feel slightly different about that one: I think the damn kid is quite funny and an almost constant source of amusement.  I did nearly mention him but it slipped my mind I think.

I'm glad you recognise the great design ethic when it came to Wolf's house - it's beautiful and pretty unique. I also love the shots of the gatehouse or whatever it is leading up to the castle (Ygor is in the window at one or two points) - nearly included it as a still as it's pretty warped and expressionistic; I love that visual style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, Livius, I feel slightly different about that one: I think the damn kid is quite funny and an almost constant source of amusement.  I did nearly mention him but it slipped my mind I think.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you recognise the great design ethic when it came to Wolf&#8217;s house - it&#8217;s beautiful and pretty unique. I also love the shots of the gatehouse or whatever it is leading up to the castle (Ygor is in the window at one or two points) - nearly included it as a still as it&#8217;s pretty warped and expressionistic; I love that visual style.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: livius</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/02/05/son-of-frankenstein/#comment-2634</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/paulwjm/2008/02/05/son-of-frankenstein/#comment-2634</guid>
					<description>Not quite as great as the first two but this still has a lot going for it. It's hard not to like anything with a cast topped by Karloff, Lugosi and Rathbone!

I agree with you that the set design was wonderful in this movie - the inside of Wolf's house being especially unforgettable.

If I have any real complaint with the movie it has to be the casting of Wolf's son. I was surprised you didn't mention him as I found him to be the biggest pain imaginable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite as great as the first two but this still has a lot going for it. It&#8217;s hard not to like anything with a cast topped by Karloff, Lugosi and Rathbone!</p>
<p>I agree with you that the set design was wonderful in this movie - the inside of Wolf&#8217;s house being especially unforgettable.</p>
<p>If I have any real complaint with the movie it has to be the casting of Wolf&#8217;s son. I was surprised you didn&#8217;t mention him as I found him to be the biggest pain imaginable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
