<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hammer Time! The Devil Ship Pirates (1963)</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/mike/2008/07/25/hammer-time-the-devil-ship-pirates-1964/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Rick Curzon</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/mike/2008/07/25/hammer-time-the-devil-ship-pirates-1964/#comment-19267</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/mike/2008/07/25/hammer-time-the-devil-ship-pirates-1964/#comment-19267</guid>
					<description>I always look at the copyright on the actual print because Hammer (and other companies around that era) tended to finish a film and then sit on it until they had the right release window.  The Old Dark House (1962) did not get released until 1966; Kiss of the Vampire (1962) till 1964; Prehistoric Women (1966)till 1968; Joseph Losey's The Damned (1961) was delayed till 1963 and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always look at the copyright on the actual print because Hammer (and other companies around that era) tended to finish a film and then sit on it until they had the right release window.  The Old Dark House (1962) did not get released until 1966; Kiss of the Vampire (1962) till 1964; Prehistoric Women (1966)till 1968; Joseph Losey&#8217;s The Damned (1961) was delayed till 1963 and so on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rick Curzon</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/mike/2008/07/25/hammer-time-the-devil-ship-pirates-1964/#comment-19251</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/mike/2008/07/25/hammer-time-the-devil-ship-pirates-1964/#comment-19251</guid>
					<description>Another excellent review, many thanks. I remember buying this on VHS in widescreen from Lumiere about ten years ago, and then on the Warners/Canal+ DVD (also letterboxed); great to finally have a superior version. Only one minor caveat, it was a 1963 production.

&lt;strong&gt;Mike&lt;/strong&gt; adds - thanks Rick! I don't know if anyone else does this but I always have the relevant IMDb page open when doing a film write-up. Hmm, maybe I shouldn't trust their information entirely from now on, as the cover does clearly state it's a 1963 film. Glad you enjoyed the review - I certainly enjoyed the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another excellent review, many thanks. I remember buying this on VHS in widescreen from Lumiere about ten years ago, and then on the Warners/Canal+ DVD (also letterboxed); great to finally have a superior version. Only one minor caveat, it was a 1963 production.</p>
<p><strong>Mike</strong> adds - thanks Rick! I don&#8217;t know if anyone else does this but I always have the relevant IMDb page open when doing a film write-up. Hmm, maybe I shouldn&#8217;t trust their information entirely from now on, as the cover does clearly state it&#8217;s a 1963 film. Glad you enjoyed the review - I certainly enjoyed the movie.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
