Archive for the '1900' Category

How He Missed His Train

Le Réveil d’un monsieur pressé, 1900, 1m10s
Star Film Catalogue No. 322

A man wakes up in bed, yawns and stretches. He gets out of bed, clad in full-length underwear, reaches for his trousers and tries to put them on. He inserts one leg, but the trousers turn into his waistcoat. Believing that it’s his mistake, he laughs and tries to put the waistcoat on properly. It changes back into his trousers, so he tries to put them on again, only to find himself inserting his feet into the sleeves of his jacket. He inserts his arms, and they change back into his trousers, and then again into his waistcoat. Now visibly annoyed, he tries putting on a boot, which turns into a top hat, and back into a boot again when he puts it on his head. He tosses it angrily to one side and goes back to bed.

Yet another variation on a theme already established by The Bewitched Inn (L’Auberge ensorcelée, 1897), Up-To-Date Spiritualism (Spiritisme abracadabrant, 1900) and Going To Bed Under Difficulties (Le Déshabillage impossible, 1900). This scenario reverses the situation of the last film, in that the unfortunate protagonist is trying to get dressed in the morning to catch his train - only to find his trousers constantly turning into his waistcoat, his boot into his hat, and so on. Once again, the effects are created by multiple jump-cuts, the gap between them getting less and less as the man’s movements grow more frantic - though at least here there is a more satisfactory resolution than in the three previous films: the first two led with him fleeing the room, the third with him seemingly caught in an infinite loop, but here he simply bows to the inevitable and goes back to bed.

There’s no reference to trains in the French title (which translates as “A man in a hurry gets up in the morning”), though the backdrop shows a railway viaduct: presumably the downside of an otherwise spectacular view is that it’s all too easy to see the train approaching when one is desperate to catch it. The man also appears to be extremely well-off - the ornate carvings surrounding the view, the wrought-iron bed, the waistcoat and top hat all suggest that he’s used to being in control. This may also explain why he gives up so quickly.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD is riddled with small spots, scratches and blotches pretty much throughout, but the underlying image is more detailed than average, making this easy to tune out. Neal Kurz’s piano accompaniment begins with a jaunty, upbeat “morning” feel, and the main theme keeps reappearing in an attempt to urge the man on, before finally descending to a rueful conclusion.

Links

Posted on 25th June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, 1900 | 2 Comments »

The Doctor and the Monkey

Le Savant et le chimpanzé, 1900, 1m04s
Star Film Catalogue No. 317

An elderly doctor keeps a monkey in a cage. When he briefly pops out, the monkey breaks free, leaps onto a nearby table and begins to systematically wreck the doctor’s study. After overturning a cupboard, he climbs up the stairs to the doctor’s bedroom. The doctor grabs it by the tail, which comes off. While the monkey trashes the bedroom, the doctor is attempting to tame the tail, which has developed a life of its own. The tail affixes itself to his face, to the horror of the doctor’s maid, who comes in to assist, eventually pulling it off. While they attack the tail with various implements, the monkey smashes a hole through the bedroom floor and jumps through it into the study. The monkey then attacks the doctor, and then the maid, ripping off her skirt and leaving her in her petticoat.

A violent farce with next to no plot - essentially, a chimpanzee caged in an elderly doctor’s study breaks free in the opening seconds and spends the rest of the film gleefully trashing the place - The Doctor and the Monkey’s immediate point of interest is its distinctive split-level set that allows us to see the study and the upstairs bedroom simultaneously. The chimp is obviously a man in a suit, and the cage seems to be made out of balsa wood, but realism is hardly Méliès’ intention - especially when the chimp’s tail, after having been severed by the enraged doctor, develops a life of its own and attaches itself to his face (via the film’s sole jump-cut) as though it were some kind of giant parasitical worm.

Méliès made his film at a time when opposition to animal experimentation was growing (the first anti-vivisection society had been formed in France in 1883, and its ideas were gaining increasing recognition by the late 1890s), though it’s unlikely that the film was ever intended as an explicit political statement: it’s far too scattershot for that.

Méliès was clearly so proud of the set that it would very soon make a repeat appearance, to more dramatically coherent effect, in What Is Home Without The Boarder? (La Maison tranquille, 1901). Painted backdrops are used to convey what is presumably the doctor’s laboratory (a skeleton hangs from the wall, and a skull is resting on a stool, and an overlarge pair of scissors might well be pressed into some kind of surgical/autopsy use. A fake entrance with a receding corridor in exaggerated perspective dominates the left-hand side of the screen. Much of the bedroom is equally fake (Méliès even paints on rays of sunlight entering via the window), though the bed that gets comprehensively demolished is real enough. However, the floor seems about as flimsy as the cage, though when the monkey breaks through it from upstairs and jumps through to land on the floor in a cloud of dust and detritus, it’s an effectively menacing moment - though it’s rapidly undercut by farce when the monkey tears off the doctor’s maid’s dress.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD is generally in excellent condition, with surface damage kept to a minimum. The sharp picture offers plenty of fine detail. Joe Rinaudo’s organ-based score maintains a pounding left-hand rhythm while introducing a more staccato and percussive feel at the top end when the monkey breaks free and starts wreaking havoc.

Links

Posted on 24th June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, Mechanical Props, 1900 | No Comments »

Eight Girls in a Barrel

Le Tonneau des Danaïdes, 1900, 1m18s
Star Film Catalogue No. 314

A bearded man leads eight women to stand behind an apparatus incorporating a trestle table, wooden steps and a large barrel. He orders each woman to climb into the barrel, roughly pushing down their heads. When all eight are in the barrel, he turns it over, revealing it to be empty. He rights the barrel, and leaves, and then reappears in the barrel.

Eight Girls in a Barrel doesn’t offer much more than is promised by the title, as it consists of a simple sequence of shots, separated by the usual jump-cuts, in which eight women are seemingly led into the same barrel, which is then revealed to be empty - and that is essentially that: there’s no real punchline aside from the magician (clad in somewhat Biblical robes and Samsonesque beard) making a final appearance in the barrel after seemingly departing the stage.

Despite dating from 1900, it could have been made at any point in the previous five years since Méliès’ discovery of the creative potential of the jump-cut, and one suspects that this was knocked off relatively quickly to meet some kind of production quota. Although the French title hints at a classical allusion, with its reference to Danaids, the relationship between the film and the original Greek myth seems somewhat tenuous: there, forty-nine out of fifty daughters of King Danaus were sentenced to fill bottomless barrels with water for all eternity as a punishment. This might have been conveyed more effectively if there had been a sense that the barrel routine was about to be repeated, and continued indefinitely, but instead we merely get the perpetrator of the trick bowing to the audience as though he was an ancient precursor of a modern stage magician like Méliès himself.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD has some very minor surface damage, but aside from a brief bout of central image softness (presumably caused by warping in the original film), the print is otherwise in very good condition, with plenty of fine detail. Eric Beheim’s electronic score, complete with tinkling bell effects, suggests a continuous march.

Links

Posted on 23rd June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, 1900 | No Comments »

Going to Bed Under Difficulties

Le Déshabillage impossible, 1900, 1m53s
Star Film Catalogue No. 312-313

A businessman enters a hotel room and hangs his umbrella, coat and hat on the leftmost of a row of hooks. He then removes his jacket and waistcoat and places them on a nearby chair. As he removes his trousers, another coat and hat appear on his back and head. He removes these and places them on the hook next to his original coat and hat, but as he removes them, another hat appears on his head, and he is clad in a pair of check trousers. This process is repeated several times, with the businessman becoming increasingly agitated. When all the hooks are full, he starts flinging his clothes into the corner, the pile growing increasingly large. Finally, he jumps on the bed and pulls the covers over himself, only for the bed to vanish. He resumes undressing again, and discovers that he is now wearing multiple layers of clothing.

Going to Bed Under Difficulties, whose French title translates as ‘Impossible Undressing’, is another set of variations on a theme already established by The Bewitched Inn (L’Auberge ensorcelée, 1897) and the then very recent Up-To-Date Spiritualism (Spiritisme abracadabrant, 1900). Once again, we have a man - some kind of business traveller, judging from his apparel at the start - attempting the ostensibly simple task of undressing for bed, only to find himself thwarted at every turn when every item of clothing he removes is instantly replaced by another.

Where this differs from and arguably improves on Up-To-Date Spiritualism is its cumulative sense of the absurd - whereas in the previous film, the various items of clothing simply vanish, here they remain in the room, rapidly filling up even a generous array of hooks before mounting up in the corner. Despite the special effects once again exclusively consisting of the simple jump-cut, the unfortunate protagonist’s movements are even more frenzied than before, creating a remarkably convincing impression of continuous movement in a film that was almost assembled frame by frame.

The frenzy continues right to the end of the film, even beyond what appears to be the climax (the vanishing of the bed at a crucial moment, a Méliès device now so familiar as to be somewhat predictable), as if to suggest that the poor man’s plight will continue indefinitely. The two earlier films mentioned above finished with the protagonists fleeing the room, though here (possibly exacerbated by the abrupt ending of the print under review) he seems doomed, Sisyphus-like, to try to undress for ever.

Méliès wasn’t the only filmmaker wringing multiple variations on this particular theme. In 1901, his British counterpart W.R. Booth made Undressing Extraordinary, or The Troubles of a Tired Traveller, which was clearly directly inspired by Méliès’ film (both the situation and the dominant jump-cut technique are essentially identical) - though Booth also threw in a couple of variations of his own, such as supernatural saucer and the unexpected appearance of a human skeleton.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD is quite grainy and contrasty - though nowhere near as bad as Addition and Subtraction (Tom Whisky ou l’illusionniste toqué, 1900) - and there’s a fair bit of surface damage, especially at the start and end, with pronounced tramlines running throughout. Eric Beheim’s electronic score begins in an upbeat mode, but rapidly becomes as relentless as the endless parade of clothing, increasing in tempo to match the protagonist’s growing desperation.

Links

Posted on 22nd June 2008
Under: Horror, Jump-Cuts, 1900 | No Comments »

A Fantastical Meal

Le Repas fantastique, 1900, 1m31s
Star Film Catalogue No. 311

A maidservant lays the dinner table for two women and an elderly man, who try to sit down - but the chairs vanish and reappear on top of the table, causing them to hit the floor with a bump. They get up, replace the chairs, and sit on them without further incident. The man takes the lid off the tureen, sticks his spoon in, and is startled to find it expanding to three times its original size. Initial enthusiasm gives way to dismay when he finds two knee-length boots inside it. He angrily orders the maid to remove both them and the tureen. He sits back down and demands the first course. The maid brings in a roast turkey. The man stands and attempts to carve it, but the table’s legs suddenly extend so that the table-top is out of reach. The man climbs on a chair, and the table shrinks to its previous height. The trio sits down again, and the table vanishes, reappearing on the other side of the room. They move over there, and the table sinks through the floor, re-emerging in its original position. They move back there, and it sinks through the floor again. They get up, and the table reappears, this time bearing a ghastly spectre that performs a macabre dance. The women flee, and the man tries to hit it with a chair, but it passes right through it. The second time, the chair hits the table, which vanishes again. The spectre is replaced with a box of dynamite, which blows the man up against the wall. His limp body falls to the ground, and then jerks around as though possessed. The women return, but can do no more than stare.

A Fantastical Meal combines the Grand Guignol fantasies of its immediate predecessor, Fat and Lean Wrestling (Nouvelles luttes extravagantes, 1900), and the comedy of frustration first seen in The Bewitched Inn (L’Auberge ensorcelée, 1896) and developed in Up-To-Date Spiritualism (Spiritisme abracadabrant, 1900) and this film’s immediate successor Going to Bed Under Difficulties (Le Déshabillage impossible, 1900). It also anticipates Luis Buñuel’s The Exterminating Angel (El Ángel exterminador, 1962) and The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (Le Charme discret de la bourgeoisie, 1972) by six or seven decades in its merciless depiction of a bourgeois trio trying and failing to sit down for a meal.

The jump-cut assault begins when they first try to sit down, as their chairs vanish in classic schoolboy-prank style, causing them to fall hard to the floor. Things seem to be looking up when the soup tureen expands to three or four times its original size, but instead of an equivalent expansion of the soup inside, it turns out to contain two boots. Less than impressed, the male head of the household blames the hapless made, tossing one of the boots after her for good measure. The next bit of business involves the table, which both elongates its legs to make it impossible to carve the succulent (if obviously fake) turkey, and sinks through the floor, reappearing on the opposite side of the room.

So far, so familiar, but Méliès then turns the film into a full-blown ghost story, as a hideous spectre appears and dances on top of the table. It was created via a superimposition, which is why the host can’t hit it with his chair. The spectre then turns into a box of dynamite which blows the host against the wall. What happens afterwards isn’t clear - it seems as though his legs shatter as though made of china, leaving them uselessly limp, and supernatural forces then force him to dance in a spectacularly undignified fashion. It’s the final humiliation, and although the maid never reappears, one suspects there’s a certain amount of quiet satisfaction in the kitchen.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD has mild surface damage (including tramlines) pretty much throughout, the frame jitters at times, and the central part of the image (where much of the action occurs) seems slightly softer than the rest - though none of this renders the film at all hard to watch. Eric Beheim’s electronic score is scrupulously neutral, with little attempt at illustrating the action.

Links

Posted on 21st June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, Mechanical Props, 1900 | No Comments »

Fat and Lean Wrestling Match

Nouvelles luttes extravagantes, 1900, 2m15s
Star Film Catalogue Nos. 309-310

Two female wrestlers help each other up and take a bow, their wrestlers’ outfits transformed into sober black dresses. They drape white sheets over themselves, removing them to reveal moustachioed male wrestlers, who begin a bout. The curly-haired wrestler is grappled to the ground, his body flung around as though weightless. Finally, he is tossed aside, but while his opponent is preening, the curly-haired wrestler gets up, forces the bald wrestler to his knees, and knocks his head off. He then rips off each of his arms, and tears his trunk from his legs. After claiming victory, he places the trunk in a nearby chair, and replaces its head and limbs. The bald wrestler comes back to life, and the two bow. Each wrestler plucks a female wrestler from behind his opponent. All four bow, then the men pick up the women, who vanish as they do so. The men then leave arm in arm. A much fatter wrestler enters, as does a thinner opponent, who tries and fails to lift him. The fat wrestler falls on top of him, squashing him flat. He places the completely flat body in a variety of poses, eventually rolling him up. The thin wrestler unrolls himself, grabs the fat wrestler and tosses him into the air. He looks up in the air, laughs, and the fat wrestler falls back down on top of him. The thin wrestler jumps on top of his belly, and the fat wrestler explodes, his limbs and head shooting in all directions. After the thin wrestler leaves, the limbs take on a life of their own, moving towards the trunk to reconstitute the fat wrestler. He looks in the direction of his now departed opponent and expresses outrage.

We first encountered Georges Méliès’ fondness for limb-lopping Grand Guignol effects in Adventures of William Tell (Guillaume Tell et le clown, 1898), and subsequently in The Astronomer’s Dream (La Lune à un mètre, 1898) and The Cook’s Revenge (La Vengeance du gâte-sauce, 1900), though these are mild compared with the sustained indignities meted out here. During a series of wrestling bouts, people (or, thankfully, obvious dummies) are casually flung around, their heads and limbs are torn off and, in a startlingly violent climax, a man’s stomach is jumped on, causing his body to explode and his various appendages to be scattered hither and yon.

The English title is more specific than the French original, which translates as ‘New and Extravagant Bouts’. It begins with two female wrestlers, having just finished a bout of their own - and when they bow, a jump-cut replaces their outfits with long, sober black dresses that wouldn’t look out of place in a photograph of the staff of a particularly strict academy for young Victorian ladies. Another jump-cut transforms them into male wrestlers, who would look almost identical if one wasn’t bald on top and the other possessed a full head of hair.

The first on-screen bout begins conventionally enough, but a third jump-cut then transforms the curly-haired wrestler into a dummy, which is flung around with delirious abandon, his opponent’s arms windmilling with all the manic energy of the still unborn Pete Townshend. Not to be outdone, when the curly-haired wrestler springs back to life, he also engenders a dummy substitution, only here it’s not just flung around but ripped apart.

Once these two have resolved their differences and left the arena (accompanied by the two female wrestlers, who put in a surprise reappearance), we’re introduced to two successors - this time the ones that give the film its English title. Their bout is just as violent as its predecessor, though Méliès here substitutes a dummy to make it seem as though the fat wrestler has literally flattened the thin one, in the manner of Jeff Brown’s classic (albeit not yet written) children’s book Flat Stanley. The thin man’s revenge, already described above, involves one of the most perfectly-timed jump cuts in Méliès’ entire output: the effect of a clearly living human being apparently exploding is alarmingly convincing.

What’s equally convincing is the coda, in which the now abandoned fat wrestler’s body parts automatically reassemble themselves. It’s hard to tell even from frame analysis whether this was created with strings or primitive stop-motion animation: the latter seems most likely.

Although the print on Flicker Alley’s DVD is very watchable, and surface damage is less prominent than usual (at least until the very end), the image is a trifle softer than average for this disc - though this has the side-effect of hiding some of the joins. Frederick Hodges’ lively ragtime piano accompaniment perfectly matches the knockabout tone.

Links

Posted on 20th June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, Mechanical Props, 1900 | No Comments »

The Christmas Dream

Rêve de Noël, 1900, 4m15s
Star Film Catalogue Nos. 298-305

On Christmas Eve, a child is tucked up in bed. In Father Christmas’s grotto, his servants are hard at work, but take advantage of his absence to admire an elaborate procession and perform a dance featuring a ballerina solo. Father Christmas returns, grabs one of his charges by the ear and cuffs him. On the town’s snow-covered rooftops, angels deposit presents down the chimney. Bellringers announce that it’s Christmas, and a group of people enters the church, shaking off the snow. Doves flutter around the gigantic bell. People parade through the town centre, many holding lanterns. A man interrupts a Christmas feast to ask for alms, and after a brief altercation is welcomed to join the revellers. In the child’s bedroom, various presents are unwrapped as other family members come with Christmas wishes. A long line of children dances in a snowy landscape.

The Christmas Dream returns to the fantastical territory of Cinderella (Cendrillon, 1899), though goes even further in its subordination of narrative to movement and dance. Essentially, Méliès seems to be creating an impressionistic portrait of Christmas from multiple viewpoints: the mythical (Father Christmas in his workshop), the religious (the church bells, the choir), the social (the scene at the feast) and the consumerist (the present-giving), though it’s been carefully structured so that each tableau blends more or less seamlessly into the next, courtesy of carefully calibrated dissolves.

After a brief introduction in which a child is tucked up in bed on Christmas Eve, we are transported to what is presumably Santa’s grotto, though many of the trappings of the myth that we recognise today had yet to be established - this Father Christmas is a long way from the jovial white-bearded red-costumed figure that we’d find comfortingly familiar. Instead, he comes across as a harassed manager, trying to browbeat his staff into greater efficiency and chastising them when they take advantage of his absence to perform an illicit dance (complete with giant drumming rabbit scurrying briefly across the frame). One of the dancers loses a shoe, and although this seems to be building to some kind of punchline, it does appear to have been a genuine accident - presumably Méliès was unable to shoot another take because of the in-camera dissolves bookending the sequence.

The mythical material continues into the next shot, as presents are deposited down chimneys - though in an unexpected touch, the deliveries are being facilitated by two angels, their wings offset by the snow-covered roofs depicted in a foreshortened perspective familiar from other Méliès titles, which has the effect of grouping the buildings tightly together. The church spire can be seen in the distance, towering over the rest, and the whole scene is being gently blanketed with presumably artificial snow.

If the rooftop scene showed the mythical giving way to the spiritual, the next sequences provide alternative viewpoints of the religious side of Christmas, starting with the bells being tolled by a quartet of somewhat harassed ringers, being drilled by what seems like a martinet of a boss (there are echoes of Santa’s portrayal from earlier). As the worshippers enter, shaking the snow off their cloaks, Méliès dissolves to the belfry, dominated by a single huge (and blatantly artificial) bell and a number of real pigeons who are scared off by a man with a lantern inspecting the area.

Like the roof scene, this acts as a bridge from the religious to the social aspects of Christmas, and the next scene incorporates the most detailed subplot, as a beggar sits huddled in the snow outside the venue for a lavish feast, holding his hat out for alms. Most people do give him something, though this background detail is gradually usurped by more elaborate choreography of various lantern-bearing functionaries lighting the way for the more distinguished guests. The scene then cuts to the feast itself, which the beggar decides to gate-crash - and is ultimately welcomed by the host: on Christmas Day, traditional hierarchies are temporarily levelled.

We then return to the child’s bedchamber, and while the social aspects of Christmas continue to be a running theme (though this time on a family level), the consumerist elements take over, as the child is given various large animal toys, a drum, a doll and other assorted knick-knacks. Finally, all the children dance around a Christmas tree, perhaps the single most universally recognised symbol of the season, which brings the film to a fitting close (albeit a somewhat abrupt one in the print under review, which seems to end fractionally too early).

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD is occasionally a bit wobbly (there’s evidence of warping), and some shots are in better condition than others (there’s quite a bit of surface damage and exposure fluctuation), but there’s also plenty of fine detail to appreciate. Donald Sosin’s wistful score (mostly piano, with occasional percussion) is scene-specific, and does an impressive job of timing itself to the dancers in the relevant scenes, and conveying the effect of falling snow in the exteriors.

Links

Posted on 19th June 2008
Under: 1900, Dreams | 1 Comment »

The Triple Conjuror and the Living Head

L’Illusionniste double et la tête vivante, 1900, 1m18s
Star Film Catalogue Nos. 294

A man emerges from the fireplace, bows, pats two stools and splits himself in two. The doubles sit on a stool and converse. One gets up, picks up a table, and places it between them. He then produces a shop window dummy’s head, places it on the table, and places a hat on it. It comes to life, and looks from one man to the other. One crawls under the table in search of mechanical trickery. The other initially looks puzzled, then waves his hand and the table disappears, revealing a fully-formed crouching woman. She rises to her feet and chats to the man who made her appear. The other man conspires with the viewer, tiptoes up to her surreptitiously and tries to plant a kiss on her cheek. Meanwhile, the devil has entered and, unnoticed by the two other men, causes the woman to fade away into nothingness. The two men gradually notice the devil, and flee. The devil laughs and removes his make-up, revealing himself to be the spitting image of the two men from earlier. He discards his costume, bows to the audience, and retreats back into the fireplace, where he vanishes.

Following on from The Four Troublesome Heads (Un Homme de têtes, 1898) and The One-Man Band (L’Homme orchestre, 1900), here we have another film in which Georges Méliès splits himself into multiple personalities. Here, he plays all three male roles, each derived from the same individual, who for some reason performs his opening entrance and closing exit through a large fireplace. For most of the running time, there are only two Mélièses on screen, but any disappointment that this is a step back from the earlier films is mitigated by the much wider range of special effects techniques being pressed into service.

Familiar material includes the the initial split into two identical twins, the head coming to life (first seen in The Magician/Le Magicien, 1898 and elaborated in The Mysterious Knight/Le Chevalier mystère, 1899) and the slow fade into oblivion (first seen in The Mysterious Knight). There’s then a cunning sight gag (slightly spoiled by the English title’s reference to “the triple conjuror”, though not by the original French “l’illusionniste double”), as the man who’s deliberately set up to appear as another character played by a different actor turns out to be another Méliès, in a vaguely diabolical costume.

It’s another demonstration of his visual sleight of hand - he knows the audience will be watching the business between the two men and the woman, and therefore won’t be looking at the third man too closely. Even if they do, the join is virtually seamless, so it’s genuinely startling when beard, eyebrows and hat are removed to reveal Méliès underneath. Small wonder he’s laughing so heartily - he’s completely second-guessed not just the film’s other characters but also the audience.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD is in superb condition, with even the usual minor surface damage kept to a minimum (except at the very end). The Mont Alto orchestra contributes a lively and tuneful accompaniment in waltz time - entirely fitting given what must have been a formidable feat of choreography and timing on the part of the performers.

Links

Posted on 18th June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, Superimposition, 1900 | No Comments »

Up-To-Date Spiritualism

Spiritisme abracadabrant, 1900, 1m11s
Star Film Catalogue Nos. 293

A man attempts to put his top hat on a chair, but the chair scurries off into a corner. He then places his umbrella on a stool, only to see it shoot off into the far distance. He places his hat on the same stool, only to see it rising slowly upwards and repositioning itself on the floor. He tries to retrieve it, but it shoots up into the air and drops down on the other side of the stool. He finally manages to grab it, and replaces it on his head. He then places it on a nearby table, but when he removes his coat, the hat reappears on his head. He puts it back on the table, but his coat reappears on his body, followed by the hat. His movements get more frantic as he tries to divest himself of both hat and coat, with equal lack of success - even tossing it into a corner or jumping on it ultimately have no effect. He removes his coat, places it on the floor, and lowers the table on top of it to hold it down, but the same thing happens. Defeated, he leaves the room.

In terms of its basic situation, Up-To-Date Spiritualism (whose French title means something closer to “Preposterous spiritualism”) harks back to The Bewitched Inn (L’Auberge ensorcelée, 1897), in that it features a somewhat hapless protagonist being challenged and ultimately defeated by various objects developing a life of their own. Here, he’s simply trying to remove his hat and coat, but finding it impossible thanks to the intervention of apparently supernatural forces conspiring to make him end the film in exactly the same state that he began it.

For the most part, this is a return to now very familiar basics, with the jump-cut transition reigning supreme, alongside a couple of mechanical effects as a chair scurries out of frame and his hat spontaneously elevates itself into the air. The hapless protagonist’s frenzied, almost dance-like movements recall those of Tom Whisky in Addition and Subtraction (Tom Whisky ou l’illusionniste toqué). It’s fun to watch, and doesn’t outstay its welcome, but it ultimately has little new to offer.

But despite the uncharacteristically flagging inspiration on show here, Méliès would ring more variations on this particular theme in the self-describing Going To Bed Under Difficulties (Le Déshabillage impossible, also 1900), which isn’t much more involving but at least has more of a sense of cumulative absurdity.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD is suffers from a fair amount of surface damage (and quite a few splice marks), though there’s plenty of fine detail and none of it seriously affects appreciation. Frederick Hodges’ piano accompaniment is along the same lines to that which he devised for The Bewitch Inn - a lively, up-tempo, relentlessly repetitive number that perfectly matches what’s happening onscreen.

Links

Posted on 17th June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, Mechanical Props, 1900 | No Comments »

The Magic Book

Le Livre magique, 1900, 2m39s
Star Film Catalogue Nos. 289-291

A man enters a room, in the middle of which is a large stand - onto which he places a gigantic book, bilingually titled ‘Le Livre magique’/'The Magical Book’. He opens it to the first page, which features a picture of Mr Punch. Taking him by the hand, he pulls Mr Punch out of the book and into the room. He turns the page, to reveal a double portrait of Harlequin and Pierrot, pulls them into the room in a similar fashion, and then turns the page again to reveal pictures of a young woman and her father. This time, he only pulls the young woman into the room: she curtsies and performs a little dance. This attracts the attention of the book’s other characters, who surround her. Annoyed, the man pulls her father out of the book, and he waves his stick at his daughter’s suitors. The two men join forces and push Punch back into the book, followed by Harlequin, but Pierrot hides behind the book. Meanwhile, the man has pushed the young woman and her father back into the book. He finds Pierrot, grabs him by the ear and tries to force him back into the book, closing the covers. But Pierrot has yet to be absorbed back into the pages, pushes the book open again, jumping back into the room. The man forces him back into the book through the front cover, successfully, but the book then falls on top of him, flattening him completely. He then re-enters the room through the door, and bows, before picking up the book, tucking it under his arm, and leaving.

A delightful conceit that’s developed into an almost perfectly structured sketch, The Magic Book is based on a very simple idea (the characters in a book come to life when its owner thrusts his hand into the pages and drags them out), but it’s presented with more than enough visual and conceptual wit to hold attention. The characters themselves are familiar archetypes: Mr Punch, Harlequin and Pierrot (the latter costume has already seen service in 1896’s A Nightmare/Le Cauchemar and 1898’s The Magician/Le Magicien), and the chances are that the (apparent) father-daughter duo on the book’s final pages would have been equally recognisable to Méliès’ original audience.

The film has a classical three-act structure. In the first, the characters are extracted from the book, in the second, their interaction causes various complications, and in the third, they are (eventually) returned from whence they came. The second act is the most immediately engaging, as it deftly sketches a reasonably involved scenario in the space of a few seconds. The book’s owner has, up to now, been extracting all the characters, but when he comes across the double portrait of the young woman and her father, he deliberately only picks the former, as he clearly has romantic designs on her and would prefer to express these without the danger of a chaperone being present.

However, when it becomes equally clear that Punch, Harlequin and Pierrot feel the same way, the man cynically extracts the father too, knowing that he can count on his support both when it comes to stick-waving moral outrage and for assistance in shoving the various characters back from whence they came. The third act also involves a bit of business with Pierrot, who successfully evades this reinstatement at first, though it’s disappointing that Méliès’ invention flags somewhat at the very end: the visual coup of the book falling off the stand and apparently crushing the man isn’t developed at all, and he merely reappears through the door to take a bow.

There are two points of interest about the book itself: firstly, its title (which is also the title of the film) is bilingual in French and English, showing that Méliès was clearly interested in distributing the film in English-speaking territories. Secondly, related to this, is the fact that his signature accompanies the various drawings. As with the written reference to his theatre in Between Calais and Dover (Entre Calais et Douvres, 1897), this is almost certainly Méliès’ attempt to assert his copyright and prevent piracy by contriving an excuse for the author’s name to appear on screen as often as possible.

The untinted print on Flicker Alley’s DVD begins with some severe chemical damage, but settles down to something quite watchable, albeit marred by numerous faint tramlines throughout. Frederick Hodges’ piano accompaniment makes witty and highly apposite use of Debussy’s twelfth prelude, ‘Minstrels’.

Links

Posted on 16th June 2008
Under: Jump-Cuts, Mechanical Props, 1900 | No Comments »

Login     Film Journal Home     Support Forums           Journal Rating: 4/5 (5)