<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3:10 to Yuma</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/09/18/310-to-yuma/</link>
	<description>Mainly Western and Noir reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John Hodson</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/09/18/310-to-yuma/#comment-7288</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/09/18/310-to-yuma/#comment-7288</guid>
					<description>Quite agree Colin; I was surprised by just how much I hated the remake, all that ludicrous sub-spaghetti gunplay and outfits by Versace. 

Good to see you back in the saddle too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite agree Colin; I was surprised by just how much I hated the remake, all that ludicrous sub-spaghetti gunplay and outfits by Versace. </p>
<p>Good to see you back in the saddle too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Livius</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/09/18/310-to-yuma/#comment-7287</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/09/18/310-to-yuma/#comment-7287</guid>
					<description>Thanks clydefro, it's good to be back. I felt I needed to take a bit of a break from blogging and work commitments etc. gave me the chance/excuse.

As far as &lt;em&gt;Appaloosa&lt;/em&gt; is concerned, I've only seen the trailer but I agree it does look promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks clydefro, it&#8217;s good to be back. I felt I needed to take a bit of a break from blogging and work commitments etc. gave me the chance/excuse.</p>
<p>As far as <em>Appaloosa</em> is concerned, I&#8217;ve only seen the trailer but I agree it does look promising.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: clydefro</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/09/18/310-to-yuma/#comment-7283</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/09/18/310-to-yuma/#comment-7283</guid>
					<description>Nice to have you back film journaling, Livius.

I didn't really like the Mangold 3:10 to Yuma and it had nothing to do with the original. There's a new western opening up here this week called Appaloosa. I don't know when it's scheduled for release in the UK, but it seems of some interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to have you back film journaling, Livius.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really like the Mangold 3:10 to Yuma and it had nothing to do with the original. There&#8217;s a new western opening up here this week called Appaloosa. I don&#8217;t know when it&#8217;s scheduled for release in the UK, but it seems of some interest.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
