<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frontier Marshal</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/</link>
	<description>Mainly Western and Noir reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Ian W</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-2498</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-2498</guid>
					<description>I’d never heard of this before reading your review, Colin, but it sounds intriguing, if more for the cast than the actual quality of the film. A pity it’s only available with My Darling Clementine as I’ve already got the old Studio Classics release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d never heard of this before reading your review, Colin, but it sounds intriguing, if more for the cast than the actual quality of the film. A pity it’s only available with My Darling Clementine as I’ve already got the old Studio Classics release.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Hodson</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-1142</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-1142</guid>
					<description>No disc directly, but there is a cunning plan afoot which I'm keeping fingers crossed for...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No disc directly, but there is a cunning plan afoot which I&#8217;m keeping fingers crossed for&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Livius</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-1140</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-1140</guid>
					<description>Yes John, I imagine there have been a fair few claims that were less than honest.
I didn't know that about the non-US customers being excluded - that's unfortunate. Does that mean you didn't get your disc then? It's a bit rich to ask those who shelled out for the main set to double-dip again if they want to see this title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes John, I imagine there have been a fair few claims that were less than honest.<br />
I didn&#8217;t know that about the non-US customers being excluded - that&#8217;s unfortunate. Does that mean you didn&#8217;t get your disc then? It&#8217;s a bit rich to ask those who shelled out for the main set to double-dip again if they want to see this title.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Hodson</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-1136</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/livius/2008/04/09/frontier-marshal/#comment-1136</guid>
					<description>This is the only review of the disc I've seen; thanks Colin.

The trouble with the (now closed) offer for buyers of the 'Ford at Fox' box was that it wasn't so much a mail-in, as an e-mail-in and thus open to much abuse. The second problem (and most pressing to many I suspect) was that it didn't seem to apply to non-US buyers of the set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the only review of the disc I&#8217;ve seen; thanks Colin.</p>
<p>The trouble with the (now closed) offer for buyers of the &#8216;Ford at Fox&#8217; box was that it wasn&#8217;t so much a mail-in, as an e-mail-in and thus open to much abuse. The second problem (and most pressing to many I suspect) was that it didn&#8217;t seem to apply to non-US buyers of the set.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
