Man on the Tracks (1956)
Człowiek na torze
1956, black and white, 80 mins
- Director: Andrzej Munk
- Script: Andrzej Munk, Jerzy Stefan Stawiński, based on a story by Stawiński
- Camera: Romuald Kropat
- Production Design: Roman Mann
- Editing: Jadwiga Zajiček
- Sound: Józef Bartczak
- Costumes: Halina Krzyżanowska
- Production Manager: Wilhelm Hollender
- Production Company: Zespół Filmowy Kadr
- Cast: Kazimierz Opaliński (Władysław Orzechowski), Zygmunt Maciejewski (Tuszka), Zygmunt Zintel (Witold Sałata), Zygmunt Listkiewicz (Stanisław Zapora), Roman Kłosowski (Marek Nowak), Kazimierz Fabisiak (Konarski), Ludosław Kozłowski (Karaś), Janusz Bylczyński (Warda), Stanisław Marzec-Marecki (party secretary), Józef Para (railwayman), Stanisław Jaworski (Franek), Celina Klimczak (Zofia Sałata), Natalia Szymańska (Orzechowski’s wife), Józef Nowak (Jankowski), Janusz Paluszkiewicz (Krokus), Leon Niemczyk (passenger - uncredited)
Notwithstanding the fact that The Stars Must Burn (Gwiazdy muszą płonąć, 1954) and Men of the Blue Cross (Błękitny krzyż, 1955) were arguably closer to drama than documentary, Man on the Tracks is generally recognised as Andrzej Munk’s first fiction feature. And in many ways this is appropriate, as his approach here represents a far sharper break with the Social Realist propaganda films of the past than anything he had previously attempted. Although he had gradually been shifting attention from collective to individual achievements, up to now his stories had been told by a single voice, usually in the form of an omniscient narrator. Here, though, the same events are recounted from three different perspectives, an approach presumably inspired by Akira Kurosawa’s Rashomon (1950) - and by the end, our initial impressions of a seemingly straightforward event have been turned upside down.
A brief series of opening scenes sets up the situation: a passenger train driven by newly-qualified engineer Stanisław Zapora is forced to brake hard, after a man is spotted on the tracks frantically waving. The train collides with the man, killing him instantly. He is rapidly identified as Władysław Orzechowski, a former railway engineer who was widely seen as being uncooperative and divisive. Once it’s established that one of the lamps in a nearby signal was extinguished, it’s assumed that it was either a spectacular suicide or an act of deliberate sabotage, designed to cause a train crash in revenge for being forced into early retirement.
The way stationmaster Tuszka tells it, this seems an entirely plausible course of events. From the moment they first met, he and Orzechowski never got on, and relations deteriorated when Tuszka replaced his assistant with his own protegé Zapora, whom Orzechowski regards as a spy. Things came to a head during a mass meeting when Orzechowski flatly refused to go along with a planned economy drive that would involve running the trains on inferior quality coal. In Tuszka’s version of events, Orzechowski is the physical embodiment of the forces that hold back progress.
But when Zapora and Sałata, the two other members of Orzechowski’s team, are grilled, they build a more rounded portrait of a man who, while nobody’s idea of a congenial companion, is nonetheless clearly more complex than Tuszka’s dismissive impression would suggest. And as their versions of events are dramatised in flashback, it becomes increasingly clear that for all Orzechowski’s surface unpleasantness (he’s a stickler for procedure and protocol, doesn’t suffer fools gladly, and ranks the well-being of his locomotive considerably higher than that of its human operators), he is ultimately more victim than villain.
In the year when Khrushchev’s denunciation of Stalin’s crimes sent shockwaves around the world, Andrzej Munk and his writer Jerzy Stefan Stawiński (who also wrote the novel on which Andrzej Wajda based his film Kanał the following year) offered a subtle parable of how easy it is to jump to conclusions and damn without evidence. They also offer an explicit critique of collective action that would have been unthinkable until very recently - Orzechowski’s “crime” is to be too wedded to the notion of delivering the best possible service in an environment where five-year plans and targets reign supreme. Though Orzechowski is a conservative traditionalist, and the film becomes increasingly sympathetic towards him, it’s not in any sense an anti-Communist film - rather, Munk’s position is like that taken by Mateusz Birkut, the fictional Stakhanovite bricklayer protagonist of Andrzej Wajda’s Man of Marble (Człowiek z marmuru, 1976), who also turns out to be a truer socialist than those who profess to represent the ideology in positions of power. Tuszka in particular is rapidly exposed as a grudge-bearing opportunist who is only too happy to compromise his own principles in order to toe the party line and secure his own advancement.
The drama is more psychological than visceral, though Munk pulls off three impressive set-pieces in the opening near-crash, an elaborate bit of fare-dodging by Zapora (who dodges inspectors by clinging to the doors outside the moving train), and a sequence in which Zapora repairs the locomotive while it’s in motion, to score points off Orzechowski. Though perhaps the most impressive bit of narrative rug-pulling comes towards the end, when Munk shows us the real reason for the problems with the lamp. Though this is nominally part of Sałata’s story, he doesn’t witness it himself, as he’s momentarily distracted, and it’s only thanks to an astute member of the railway investigation committee putting two and two together that the correct verdict on Orzechowski’s actions is finally reached.
Working largely with his regular documentary team, Munk makes good use of his experience working with trains in the earlier, very different 1953 documentary The Railwayman’s Word (Kolejarskie słowo). Romuald Kropat is once again the cinematographer and Jadwiga Zajiček the editor, and they both create a powerful sense of a world dominated by giant and impersonal machines: there’s scarcely a shot that doesn’t feature a steam train. This is further emphasised by Józef Bartczak’s soundtrack, which plays out to a constant background of clanking machinery and hissing whistles, an effect enhanced by the total absence of music.
The performances are generally excellent, with Kazimierz Opaliński and Zygmunt Listkiewicz outstanding as the rivals Orzechowski and Zapora. Two scenes underscore the subtlety of Munk’s direction and Opaliński’s performance - when Orzechowski meets and reminisces with an old friend, and when he accidentally encounters Zapora in a park on their day off, treating him with impeccably old-fashioned courtesy and charm as though their daily power-struggles had never happened. And it’s not the least aspect of Munk’s considerable achievement that he ends up treating Orzechowski - a character who could easily have remained the crude archetype peddled by Tuszka - with equal courtesy. Munk was presumably not blind to the irony that he would have to turn to fiction in order to tell something closer to the truth - Krzysztof Kieślowski would make the same discovery over two decades later.
DVD Distribution: There are two DVD releases of Man on the Tracks, though the apparent absence of subtitles on the Polish edition (Best Film Co, Region 0 PAL) means that the only viable option for non-Polish speakers is Polart’s edition (Region 0 NTSC).
Picture: By the standards of this variable label, this wasn’t at all bad, if hardly demonstration quality. The source print is a little battered, and some shots are greyer than others, but on the whole Romuald Kropat’s black-and-white photography comes across well, and the 4:3 aspect ratio appears to be correct. Although it’s a PAL-to-NTSC transfer, the drawbacks are nowhere near as pronounced as they were with Polart’s edition of Andrzej Wajda’s Innocent Sorcerers - there’s a bit of motion judder at times, but it’s easy enough to tune out.
Sound: Typical 1950s mono, but entirely adequate for the purpose, and with no audible flaws worth noting.
Subtitles: A pleasant surprise. Although there are a couple of typos, and they occasionally spill over onto three lines, these are minor niggles compared with the fact that they’re white, clear, idiomatic, properly synchronised and optional.
Extras: The only extras are a short text biography of Munk, a filmography, and a copy of Stanislaw Zamecznik’s original poster from 1957 (which, like most Polish film posters, is a work of art in its own right, and is reproduced at the top of this piece). ‘Also Available’ links to cover scans of other Polart releases, but no trailers or other video material.
Links
- YouTube has an extract from the middle of the film, albeit in unsubtitled Polish.
- Filmpolski.pl (in Polish)
- Internet Movie Database
- Reviews: Critical Culture (Pacze Moi); Dennis Grunes; Strictly Film School (Acquarello); Ozu’s World (Dennis Schwartz)
- Two articles on Munk, from Culture.pl and Film Comment (Stuart Klawans), both discuss Man on the Tracks in the context of the rest of his work.
- DVD available from: Amazon.com; DVD Empire; Polart.com
Posted on 18th February 2008
Under: Reviews, Poland, Andrzej Munk | No Comments »
Spacerek staromiejski
Hearing a massed verse recitation from another classroom window, accompanied by the (electronically-heightened) sound of a besom broom sweeping the courtyard, she impulsively starts to “conduct” the end result. Popping into a church, she is enraptured both by the sight and sound of an organ being installed (the craftsman painstakingly testing each of the pipes before putting them into place) and the potential offered by the building’s echo - she takes out her violin and experimentally plucks the strings before being interrupted by a stern-looking priest.
By all accounts, this was one of Munk’s most personal films, and it’s easy to see why: the lack of any spoken content makes it far more open to individual interpretation, and its explorations of the creative potential of pure sound rank among the most inventive of any film of its era. Munk was a long-term music lover, and had already experimented with musical ideas informing a film’s structure in his second fiction feature Eroica (1957). Aside from its central scenario, it’s valuable both as a record of old Warsaw as it stood in the late 1950s, and it could also conceivably be screened as a visual demonstration of the principles of musique concrète, as natural sounds are usurped by Markowski’s electronic reimaginings. It’s certainly the most original of the Andrzej Munk documentaries that I’ve seen, and arguably the best.
Niedzielny poranek
While bleary-eyed, still pyjama’d citizens can be glimpsed through their windows, their more energetic counterparts cycle en masse or get the bus. Not only is a seat guaranteed at this time of the morning, but also a lively chat with the conductor. Jealous, the driver speeds up the bus, almost winging a passing car, to shorten their conversation. This is one of many mischievous touches that would have been unimaginable in po-faced propaganda like Munk’s strictly party-line
Along the way, Munk also gives us a tourist-guide view of Warsaw, the still scaffolding-bedecked Culture Palace, the popular meeting-point of Zygmunt’s Column by the Royal Castle, promenading citizens, gossiping women (”They haven’t seen each other for ages - not since last night”), tree-lined avenues, squares and parks. Witty trompe l’oeil effects include a bus apparently caught in a downpour (it’s being cleaned) and a hand seemingly about to pick a pocket (it’s a woman alerting a friend to her presence). The bus runs alongside a tram, and two of its younger passengers smile shyly at each other - later, the man will ask the driver to slow down at the exact point when the tram rounds a corner, so he can switch vehicles.
Błękitny krzyż
It’s set in early 1945, when the outcome of the war was no longer in doubt but sporadic fighting was still going on. Three wounded men are trapped in a ‘field hospital’ (actually a rickety shack halfway up a mountain) in German-controlled territory, dangerously near a newly-constructed outpost. Repiszczak was shot in the leg, which he now cannot bend, while Russian paratrooper Maxim Oleynikov has severe frostbite in both legs (in one painful scene, he has to have his toes amputated without anaesthetic to avoid gangrene). Partisan fighter Sedyakov (aka Tikhon) is more mobile, but being shot in the lung has affected his stamina. The hospital’s entire staff consists of Slovak-born Dr Juraj and his foster-daughter Bożenka, and they have to get their patients out to nearby Zakopane if they’re to have a chance of recovery.
One immediate difference between this film and its predecessors is that the narration no longer takes a God’s (or state’s)-eye view of the proceedings. By quoting directly from the rescuers’ official diaries, Holoubek effectively becomes a member of the team, drawing the viewer into the operation. The dearth of synchronised sound precludes much identification with individuals (there’s clearly something going on between Maxim and Bożenka, but it’s restricted to sidelong glances), but that’s in line with what was still the dominant Socialist Realist mode of stressing the co-operative element - in this case an international one, as the Soviets, Slovaks and Poles are effectively as one. But this time round, Munk almost entirely rejects the ideological lecture: the narration is as likely to single out achievements of individuals like Byrcyn as it is to champion the work of the Rescue Service as a whole.
Gwiazdy muszą płonąć
Munk’s episode is the one about the abandoned mineshaft, and is much the most successful. This is because he uses its straightforward narrative as an excuse for blending some impressively atmospheric photography with near-constant suspense, as the miners are faced with the ever-present dangers of rock falls and gas-fuelled explosions, and are linked to the surface only by a decidedly unreliable Ariadne’s thread of a phone cable.
A third of the way through, after the first attempt at uncovering the old seam fails, the scene changes to a different mine in Milkowice, a much smaller operation that’s the last Polish mine to employ pit ponies. Lesiewicz’s middle episode is much more leisurely than Munk’s, and much more prone to cuteness (the scene where the horse Andalusia demonstrates her counting skills) and pathos (the ponies’ days are numbered, as are those of old Górecki), though there’s an effectively lyrical scene when Górecki and his young colleague Tuleja take the ponies out to run free in a nearby field, the accompanying woodwind now in a higher register.
Kolejarskie słowo
Next comes the dispatching process, the entire subject of Karabasz’ film, though given briefer treatment here as we catch only occasional glimpses of the complex logistics that they have to wrestle with to ensure that they don’t, as the commentary puts it, “lose a train”. The remaining three-quarters of the film follows the progress of warranted coke train no. 49281 as it passes various stages en route from Silesia to Szczecin, with telephoned reports on the progress of it and all the other trains in the region constantly relayed back to the dispatchers and forwarded to their colleagues further along the track.
What’s far more successful is Romuald Kropat’s photography, favouring imposing low-angle shots of the trains both in motion and at rest, when they’re backlit in a way that emphasises the steam, as though they’re sweating copiously after a hard day’s effort. There are also silent close-ups of the workers’ faces, often chiselled into sharp relief by high-contrast lighting, expressions generally serious, though there’s a brief interlude when two small girls wave at the driver and he responds in kind. But these moments are few and far between: group effort and co-operation is still very much the name of this particular game.
Peasant Diaries
It was inspired by a 1935 book of the same title, which compiled first-person accounts of peasant life in pre-World War II (and pre-Communist) Poland. By tracking down three of the authors and comparing their lives in 1952 with the situation seventeen years earlier, Munk managed both to meet official requirements and strike out on his own (albeit to a limited extent). Because his subjects’ living standards had dramatically improved across the board, the film became more than acceptable as propaganda, but the subject also allowed Munk the freedom to explore their individual lives.
The third is Antoni Dabin, whose 1935 diary talks about deprivation so severe that even matches were a luxury. Needless to say, by 1952 he has attained both electric lighting and a prestigious job (chairman of the production cooperative in Hrynkow), with his daughter taking the various mod cons for granted. The film concludes with images of Dabin’s cooperative carrying out their harvest - all massed tractors and blond combine-harvester operators reaping the golden wheat, while the narrator waxes lyrical about the spirit of brotherly collaboration.
Destination Nowa Huta!
Notably unlike the early documentaries of Kazimierz Karabasz, Andrzej Munk’s film is unabashed propaganda for the Polish state’s cause, extolling the virtues of the giant construction project that sought to establish Nowa Huta as a major industrial centre. It was also deliberately populated by working-class workers who, the authorities believed, would act as a counterweight to middle-class protesters in Kraków who objected to Communist rule - though you won’t find even a hint of that in the film. Here, the stated reason for the Nowa Huta project is to prevent the peasants in a nearby village from either starving or having to travel abroad to seek work.
The narration (read by Andrzej Łapicki, perhaps best known in the west for playing the Wajda surrogate in his Everything For Sale/Wszystko na sprzedaż in 1968) is appropriately stentorian, leaving no cliché unturned (”Brighter days are no longer pie in the sky - each working day and each thrust of the shovel brings them closer!”). The film also emphasises how the output of Nowa Huta’s steelworks will supply the entire country - and, more tellingly, highlights the input of the USSR in terms of design, planning and logistics. At leisure, a worker is shown reading his favourite book - naturally, by a Soviet writer.