jump to navigation

Alien (Ridley Scott, USA, 1979) March 23, 2009

Posted by Daniel Stephens in : 1970s, Film reviews, Artfully Deranged, Feminism, Genre, Audience , 6 comments

Dir. Ridley Scott; Written by Dan O’Bannon; starring Sigourney Weaver, John Hurt, Ian Holm, Tom Skerritt, Veronica Cartwright, Harry Dean Stanton, Yaphet Kotto

My introduction to Ridley Scott’s space opus came sometime after being bowled over by James Cameron’s sequel. I guess it must have been around 1990, before David Fincher released the third instalment of the Alien saga. My ignorance of Scott’s sci-fi horror had to do with the fact I wasn’t born when it was first released in 1979, and partly because my mother had withheld the video from her impressionable son’s eyes; possibly fearing permanent psychological damage. This fear didn’t last long, since my determination to witness the Alien’s first cinematic adventure far outweighed her parental guidance. Coupled with the fact Alien was one of my Mum’s favourite movies, it wasn’t long before I was another devoted fan of Alien, Ripley, and the space-horror franchise. And, for the sake of not undermining my mother, I can safely say there was no psychological damage causedat least, that’s what my shrink tells me.

My first impression of Alien was one that appears the going trend. Quite honestly, it was one of the most frightening experiences of my movie watching life. Director Ridley Scott concocts a claustrophobic, uncompromising cinematic experience that bottles up all that is good about the haunted house movie and delivers it with teeth sharp enough to cut through the screen and take your arms and legs off. From the minute the opening credit sequence starts (bringing you out of your home comforts - that include a reassuring open fire and a locked door - into the unending expanse of outer space), the hieroglyphic letters appearing slowly and methodically onscreen offering no sense of hope, you’re left exposed, alone, vulnerable.

Alien was developed in the mid-1970s, the brainchild of film school graduate Dan O’Bannon. O’Bannon had worked with John Carpenter on what would become simultaneously the most successful student film and the worst professional film ever released theatrically - Dark Star. The film, a precursor to O’Bannon’s Alien, saw a group of astronauts bidding to stay alive aboard a spacecraft housing a rather nasty but ultimately timid looking alien creature. After O’Bannon left film school and saw his next project fall flat on its face, he turned to friend and producer Ronald Shusett for help. Together, they fleshed out O’Bannon’s concept and started shopping it… [MORE]

Rating: 5/5

Alien in the monstrous grasp of womankind April 3, 2007

Posted by Daniel Stephens in : Artfully Deranged, Feminism , add a comment

A critical study closely examining Ridley Scott’s Alien (1979) as a re-evaluation of feminist culture in cinema

Looking at feminist writer Laura Mulvey’s analysis of the classical Hollywood film it is interesting how Alien (Scott, 1979) defies her claims about scopophilia, in that the film both subverts her ideas about voyeuristic visual pleasure and narcissistic visual pleasure. (Mulvey, 1975/1989, pg. 353) Mulvey claims that scopophilia (the desire to see) is a fundamental drive according to Freud and that it is sexual in nature. Therefore film uses this in two ways – one is that of voyeurism, both of character, figure and situation, and the second is that of narcissism within the story and the image. She sees scopophilia as a structure that functions on an axis of activity and passivity and that this is gendered. From a voyeuristic point of view, her analysis of classical Hollywood film established ‘the male character as active and powerful: he is the agent around whom the dramatic action unfolds and the look gets organised. The female character is passive and powerless: she is the object of desire for the male character.’ (Mulvey, 1975/1989, pg. 353) This appears to be reversed in Alien as the active and powerful character who defeats the alien and outlives all, including the men, is female. Furthermore, the dramatic action unfolds around her, and the male characters are presented as weak – Captain Dallas makes mistakes, he breaks quarantine laws and cannot protect his team, eventually dying; and robot Ash, whose look and appearance is that of a man, malfunctions and fails his duties. From a narcissistic point of view, Mulvey argues that the audience is forced to see the male character as the powerful, idealised one over the female because she cites Lacan’s concepts of ego formation as the driving force. Lacan claimed that a child derives pleasure from a perfect mirror image of itself and forms its ‘ego’ based on that idealised image. Mulvey therefore says, the ‘representation of the more perfect, more complete, more powerful ideal ego of the male hero stands in stark opposition to the distorted image of the passive and powerless female character.’ (Mulvey, 1975/1989, pg. 354)

In Alien the roles are clearly reversed, as Ripley is the strong female character who makes active judgements and survives what is trying to kill her. The male character’s activity is largely passive – most die quickly, others wait for her command. It is Ripley who makes the plan to defeat the alien which works, while the ‘powerless’ male Captain makes bad judgements as his unsure plan fails and he is killed. So the idealised image, based on Lacan’s theory, is with the female and not the male. This therefore suggests that contrary to classical Hollywood cinema (Mulvey’s main focus was pre-1960), modern horror films, such as Alien, offer both visual and narcissistic pleasure based primarily on the female character rather than the male character.

Mulvey also argues that in Classical Hollywood narrative the concept of the ‘woman’ is an idea which is fundamentally ambiguous in that ‘it combines attraction and seduction with the evocation of castration anxiety’. (Mulvey, 1975/1989, pg 354) This idea, based firmly in Freudian theory, sees the female character being a source of much deeper fears for the male due to her appearance reminding him of the lack of a penis, hence castration anxiety. She argues that this is solved both in the narrative and in what she terms ‘fetishism’. In the narrative Mulvey cites Hitchcock’s films as prime examples, notably Vertigo (Hitchcock, 1958) and Rebecca (Hitchcock, 1940) where the woman is punished for creating the fear of castration for the male, and her guilt is either sealed through that punishment or there occurs a salvation. Two typical endings would include death (punishment) or marriage to the main male protagonist (salvation). Alien defies this as the woman is not punished or saved, as she saves herself without male assistance. Her salvation is brought about by her own doing, and it could be argued that both elements of the film that could have brought her death are asexual, or as Barbara Creed would claim, they are the ‘monstrous feminine’. The alien is unspecific in gender by appearance, and Ripley must fight a computer going by the name of ‘mother’, that suggests she is actually battling another female. Mulvey goes onto argue that through ‘fetishism’ the woman deflects attention away from castration anxiety by changing ‘from a dangerous figure into a reassuring object of flawless beauty.’ (Mulvey, 9175/1989, pg 354)

Yet both female characters in Alien are presented as dishevelled and tired throughout. Their astronaut’s uniforms don’t display their female figure, and their lack of make-up positions them further from what Mulvey says is ‘flawless beauty’. Therefore Alien acts almost as a pro-feminist film because it defies many of the very characteristics that Mulvey claims make classic Hollywood cinema anti-‘woman’. Yet, even more so, because castration anxiety is not lost in the film, and as Barbara Creed investigates, it is a major part of the film’s underlying context. Ripley survives and defeats the alien therefore ‘woman’ is not punished or saved, and the ‘fear’ of castration is still apparent and never solved. If this Freudian theory of male fear is not solved, then the film takes on an appearance of empowering females within the context of the film, as the female is left with all the power and the dramatic action is entirely centred on her. Barbara Creed supports this in that she discusses how Ripley undresses at the end of the film. ‘Ripley’s body is pleasurable and reassuring to look at. She signifies the ‘acceptable’ form and shape of woman.’ (Creed, 1993, pg. 23) This appears to reaffirm her sexuality but instead of being detrimental to her character’s gender, it would appear, based on the relevance of narcissistic visual pleasure, that this is actually a celebration of the strong female role, and an underlying of that fact.

Counter-argument against Mulvey’s thesis may ultimately come about because she doesn’t account for the female ‘gaze’ and only relates to the male ‘gaze’. Yet her argument against critics that made this point about her makes for an interesting interpretation of why Ripley’s role, served usually by male actors, is pleasurable to the female viewer, and perhaps an answer why the strong female character must take on a level of masculinity to express her power. Returning to Freud, Mulvey says that according to the pre-oedipal and phallic fantasy stage of development which affects boys and girls in the same way, and is essentially masculine, means women must shed this active part of masculinity within themselves to achieve ‘proper’ femininity. Ripley’s show of male-like dominance, power and masculinity is pleasurable for women because ‘female spectators negotiate the masculinisation of the spectatorial position in Hollywood cinema, because it signifies for them a pleasurable rediscovery of a lost aspect of their sexual identity.’ (Mulvey, 1975/1989, pg. 355) Therefore from Mulvey’s analysis we can argue that Ripley can indeed take on a level of masculinity while simply celebrating her own femininity - a ‘lost aspect of [her own] sexual identity’, and not a woman who is ‘restless in her transvestite clothes’ (Mulvey, 1975/1989, pg 355), because Ripley reaffirms her own sexuality when she removes her clothes at the end of the film.

Carol Clover in her work analysing ‘slasher’ films and her theories of the ‘Final girl’ can explain this masculinisation of the female lead character. She claims that male and female spectators identify bisexually and she separates out the differences between appearance (sex) and behaviour (gender). Examining narrative she states that the ‘Final Girl: the one girl in the film who fights, resists and survives the killer-monster, [is the one who] acquires the gaze, and dominates the action, and is thus masculinised.’ (Clover, 1992, pg. 357) In Alien, Ripley acquires the gaze by being the only one left alive, and dominates the action by defeating the alien. Clover argues that by openly playing on the difference between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’, that the ‘theatricalisation of gender’ feminises the audience because the woman is her own saviour making her the hero, at which point the male viewer gives up the last pretence of male identification. (Clover, 1992) Like the ‘slasher’ film, Alien’s Ripley displays many of the narrative characteristics which Clover discusses, and Clover is adamant the modern horror film ‘adjusts gender representations and identifications’ (Clover, 1992. pg 378), something Hollywood wasn’t doing pre-1960 according to Mulvey. What Clover appears to be arguing is that through the ‘Final Girl’ modern horror cinema is largely a feminist movement because ‘the male gives up the last pretence of male identification’. Whilst gender roles can differ, the masculinisation of a character such as Ripley, only serves as a celebration of feminism, and instead of, as Mulvey claimed, women being ‘passive and powerless’, they are now being empowered at the expense of men.

Barbara Creed closely analysed Alien using Freud as a basis, and using one of her arguments regarding what she teems the ‘archaic mother’, it is possible to examine Alien’s femininity from a totally different approach to that of Laura Mulvey and Carol Clover. Using Freud’s notes on the ‘primal fantasies’, and his ideas that children either view their parents having sex or have fantasies about seeing them have sex, a child may perceive ‘whether in reality or fantasy, the primal scene as a monstrous act it may fantasise animals or mythical creatures taking part.’ (Creed, 1993. pg. 18) She uses this idea of ‘sex’ and the ‘monstrous’ and relates it to the film Alien. Instead of seeing female characters from their role within the narrative, or their appearance, Creed suggests that the very ‘monster’ and ‘monstrous’ within the film is feminine in nature, and this therefore totally disparages Mulvey’s claims of the ‘passive’ female, because the film’s very active ‘power’ comes from that which is rooted in femininity. She does this by investigating the ‘archaic mother’ – that which is ‘the point of origin and of end’, that which represents life and death. This ‘mother’ is inherently female. Creed calls the alien a ‘parthenogenetic mother, the mother of primordial abyss’ which relates to the fact of sexual reproduction without the need for fertilisation, and therefore without a male. In Freud’s theory this would be a ‘fear’ for the male, and Creed argues that this therefore empowers femininity as it suggests the female is that which creates life and takes life away, without the necessity of the male. She cites several areas where Alien suggests this. In the opening sequence the camera travels through the long corridors of the ship which Creed relates to the inner workings of the female body, before settling on a chamber where the seven astronauts are awoken. Creed discusses this room as ‘womb-like’, and as the astronauts awake and come out of the sleeping pods, she relates this to giving birth and the computer, called ‘mother’ in the film, which brings them to ‘life’ represents that ‘the father is completely absent, here the mother is sole parent and sole-life support.’ (Creed, 1992. pg. 18) Another moment when the ‘archaic mother’ is represented is when the three astronauts investigate the alien spaceship. Here, Creed discusses the idea that they go through a door in the ship shaped like a ‘vagina’ and walk through a passage that could again represent the inner body of a woman. They then enter a large room full of eggs, which represents the womb. This underlying notion of the female body and reproductive organs continually signifies the ‘archaic mother’ and life and death. When Kane is ‘raped’ by the alien ‘the primeval mother does not need the male as ‘father’, only as a host body, and the alien creature murderously gnaws its way through Kane’s body’ killing him. (Creed, 1992. pg.28) This is a representation of the ‘parthenogenetic mother’, the one that does not need the male or father. Creed’s analysis empowers femininity by drawing on the ideas that modern horror films require an underlying context that belittles masculinity and male existence, and suggests that female representations seen by Mulvey were patriarchal defence mechanisms. ‘The concept of the parthenogenetic, archaic mother adds another dimension to the maternal figure and presents us with a new way of understanding how patriarchal ideology works to deny the difference of ‘woman’ in her cinematic representation.’ (Creed, 192. pg 20)

Bibliography

Bordwell, D (1985) Narration In The Fiction Film London: Routledge

Clover, C (1992) The Cinema Book – Second Edition (Classical Film Narrative). London: BFI

Creed, B (1993) The Montrous Feminine – Film, Feminism and Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge

Freud, S ( - ) ‘Analysis of a phobia of a five year old boy’ – The Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth

Freud, S ( - ) ‘Female Sexuality’ - The Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth

Freud, S ( - ) ‘Fetishism’ - The Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth

Freud, S ( - ) ‘Totem and taboo’ - The Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth

Freud, S ( - ) ‘The infantile genital organisation’ - The Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth

Freud, S ( - ) Three essays on the theory of sexuality’ - The Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud London: Hogarth

Mulvey, L (1975/1989) The Cinema Book – Second Edition (Classical Film Narrative). London: BFI

Whitehead, M (2003) Slasher Movies New York: Trafalgar

Login     Film Journal Home     Support Forums           Journal Rating: 4/5 (8)