<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 100 Films in a Year</title>
	<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films</link>
	<description>12 months. 100 films. Hopefully.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on #93: Letters From Iwo Jima (2006) by Flags of Our Fathers (2006) &#124; 100 Films in a Year</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2007/08/23/93-letters-from-iwo-jima-2006/#comment-137783</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 22:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2007/08/23/93-letters-from-iwo-jima-2006/#comment-137783</guid>
					<description>[...] It&amp;#8217;s been two years since I reviewed the second in Clint Eastwood&amp;#8217;s 2006 double bill of World War II films; thanks to the machinations of my DVD rental site, it&amp;#8217;s taken this long to see the first. In a somewhat innovative move, the pair examine both sides of the battle for Iwo Jima: Letters from Iwo Jima from the (losing) Japanese perspective, while Flags of Our Fathers shows the (victorious, obviously) American view. I found Letters to be a fair effort, if undeserving of some of the praise and nominations it garnered, but the consensus seems to have it that this first half isn&amp;#8217;t as good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It&#8217;s been two years since I reviewed the second in Clint Eastwood&#8217;s 2006 double bill of World War II films; thanks to the machinations of my DVD rental site, it&#8217;s taken this long to see the first. In a somewhat innovative move, the pair examine both sides of the battle for Iwo Jima: Letters from Iwo Jima from the (losing) Japanese perspective, while Flags of Our Fathers shows the (victorious, obviously) American view. I found Letters to be a fair effort, if undeserving of some of the praise and nominations it garnered, but the consensus seems to have it that this first half isn&#8217;t as good. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1993) by jackjack</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2013/03/06/batman-mask-of-the-phantasm-1993/#comment-135761</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2013/03/06/batman-mask-of-the-phantasm-1993/#comment-135761</guid>
					<description>Man, is this a matter of question? &quot;Phantasm&quot; is the most impressive and compelling batman movie ever made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, is this a matter of question? &#8220;Phantasm&#8221; is the most impressive and compelling batman movie ever made.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #72: Sucker Punch: Extended Cut (2011) by badblokebob</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2011/10/11/72-sucker-punch-extended-cut-2011/#comment-135195</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2011/10/11/72-sucker-punch-extended-cut-2011/#comment-135195</guid>
					<description>I suspect this may be spam, but in case not... the formatting is thoroughly messed up all over this blog. Try my new one at &lt;a href=&quot;http://100filmsinayear.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://100filmsinayear.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect this may be spam, but in case not&#8230; the formatting is thoroughly messed up all over this blog. Try my new one at <a href="http://100filmsinayear.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://100filmsinayear.wordpress.com</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #72: Sucker Punch: Extended Cut (2011) by debs Dresses Dublin</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2011/10/11/72-sucker-punch-extended-cut-2011/#comment-135086</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2011/10/11/72-sucker-punch-extended-cut-2011/#comment-135086</guid>
					<description>I don't know whether it's just me or if perhaps everyone else encountering problems with your website.

It appears as if some of the written text within your content are running off 
the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know 
if this is happening to them as well? This may be a problem 
with my web browser because I've had this happen before. Kudos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know whether it&#8217;s just me or if perhaps everyone else encountering problems with your website.</p>
<p>It appears as if some of the written text within your content are running off<br />
the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know<br />
if this is happening to them as well? This may be a problem<br />
with my web browser because I&#8217;ve had this happen before. Kudos
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Room on the Broom (2012) by linda</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2013/01/22/room-on-the-broom-2012/#comment-134878</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2013/01/22/room-on-the-broom-2012/#comment-134878</guid>
					<description>Hi! Really glad you enjoyed Room on the Broom, I thought you might be interested to know that there are resources for parents and children and a shop to buy the official DVD and  toys on the official website roomonthebroom.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Really glad you enjoyed Room on the Broom, I thought you might be interested to know that there are resources for parents and children and a shop to buy the official DVD and  toys on the official website roomonthebroom.com
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #58: Texas Across the River (1966) by Eddie C</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2008/09/20/58-texas-across-the-river-1966/#comment-134446</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2008/09/20/58-texas-across-the-river-1966/#comment-134446</guid>
					<description>Dean Martin is a very underated actor.  He was good in every movie he was in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean Martin is a very underated actor.  He was good in every movie he was in.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #37: Young Guns (1988) by Austin</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2011/11/12/37-young-guns-1988/#comment-130648</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2011/11/12/37-young-guns-1988/#comment-130648</guid>
					<description>Interesting notes. I often wondered about the end. How did they get away so easy a quick agaist odds and had no one to chase them off? Of course the other under logical (forgive my poor term here) scense are also this way in this film. However, this set aside believe this movie did its tole on the younger generation as I remember when this movie came out and I was about 10 at the time and could not see it, but the other kids got to see it. It became one of my favorites due to this and the nature of it being a &quot;scrappy naration and screen play&quot; was the reason for people to like it, cuase they figured they could do something like this and we played out the movie, or at least tried to, as kids. The legend of Billy the Kid became a icon for me as I began my fasination with the Old West. For me, despite the things said here, it was a &quot;classic&quot; and a style all its own for a generation of younger people. For that reason alone it caused the spin-off of the even more illogical sequel where Billy The Kid lives a full life...its roots in this earned it it's own distiction as a different western of a more modern time... Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting notes. I often wondered about the end. How did they get away so easy a quick agaist odds and had no one to chase them off? Of course the other under logical (forgive my poor term here) scense are also this way in this film. However, this set aside believe this movie did its tole on the younger generation as I remember when this movie came out and I was about 10 at the time and could not see it, but the other kids got to see it. It became one of my favorites due to this and the nature of it being a &#8220;scrappy naration and screen play&#8221; was the reason for people to like it, cuase they figured they could do something like this and we played out the movie, or at least tried to, as kids. The legend of Billy the Kid became a icon for me as I began my fasination with the Old West. For me, despite the things said here, it was a &#8220;classic&#8221; and a style all its own for a generation of younger people. For that reason alone it caused the spin-off of the even more illogical sequel where Billy The Kid lives a full life&#8230;its roots in this earned it it&#8217;s own distiction as a different western of a more modern time&#8230; Thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #52: Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame (2010) by ghost of 82</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2012/07/06/52-detective-dee-and-the-mystery-of-the-phantom-flame-2010/#comment-128510</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2012/07/06/52-detective-dee-and-the-mystery-of-the-phantom-flame-2010/#comment-128510</guid>
					<description>Weird, I was absently flicking channels late last night, watched a bit of Firefox and then the last twenty minutes of Farscape: Peacekeeper Wars, and then fell upon this odd-looking movie. Wondered what the hell I was watching and thinking how dangerous flicking channels late at night can be, went to bed. Well now I know what that strange film was!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, I was absently flicking channels late last night, watched a bit of Firefox and then the last twenty minutes of Farscape: Peacekeeper Wars, and then fell upon this odd-looking movie. Wondered what the hell I was watching and thinking how dangerous flicking channels late at night can be, went to bed. Well now I know what that strange film was!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on June 2012 by badblokebob</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2012/06/30/june-2012/#comment-128443</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2012/06/30/june-2012/#comment-128443</guid>
					<description>I thought &lt;i&gt;The Lost Weekend&lt;/i&gt; was brilliant, so I hope you get as much out of it as I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought <i>The Lost Weekend</i> was brilliant, so I hope you get as much out of it as I did.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on June 2012 by ghost of 82</title>
		<link>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2012/06/30/june-2012/#comment-128408</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 12:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://filmjournal.net/100films/2012/06/30/june-2012/#comment-128408</guid>
					<description>I picked up Lost Weekend last week, haven't seen it yet- my wife is a Wimbledon nut so I won't see much of anything for a fortnight. It's a Billy Wilder film I ever never seen, so I'm going to savour it. 

Hope you enjoy John Carter as much as I did- lower your expectations and you may be very surprised. That probably sounds odd but in these days of hype (positive and negative) on everything, it helps. I think there was some kind of feeding frenzy on John Carter. Anyway, I look forward to your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picked up Lost Weekend last week, haven&#8217;t seen it yet- my wife is a Wimbledon nut so I won&#8217;t see much of anything for a fortnight. It&#8217;s a Billy Wilder film I ever never seen, so I&#8217;m going to savour it. </p>
<p>Hope you enjoy John Carter as much as I did- lower your expectations and you may be very surprised. That probably sounds odd but in these days of hype (positive and negative) on everything, it helps. I think there was some kind of feeding frenzy on John Carter. Anyway, I look forward to your thoughts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
