jump to navigation

#59: The Saint in New York (1938) July 26, 2012

Posted by badblokebob in : Thriller, Crime, adaptations, 3 stars, 1930s, Mystery, 2012 , add a comment

The Saint in New York is available on iPlayer until 31st July.

My review:

#47: Bad Day at Black Rock (1955) July 24, 2012

Posted by badblokebob in : Drama, Thriller, Crime, Western, adaptations, 4 stars, 1950s, Mystery, 2012 , add a comment

Bad Day at Black Rock is on Film4 today at 5pm, and again on Thursday at 12:40pm. My review:

The Dark Knight Rises: Initial Thoughts (no spoilers) July 20, 2012

Posted by badblokebob in : Editorials, Action, Thriller, Fantasy, Sci-fi, adaptations, Adventure, superhero films, 'initial thoughts', 2010s, 2012 , add a comment

I haven’t done an ‘initial thoughts’ piece for years. Mainly because I rarely go to the cinema at all, let alone race there on release day. But I did for TDKR, and so a smattering of my thoughts are now up on my other blog:

The Batman Series

Posted by badblokebob in : Action, Fantasy, Sci-fi, Crime, 2000s, adaptations, 1990s, 1980s, Adventure, superhero films, Specials, Film Noir: Pre/Post/Neo/etc., 2012 , add a comment

New mini reviews of Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, here:

I may well have some thoughts about The Dark Knight Rises up later today too.

#19: Devil (2010) July 11, 2012

Posted by badblokebob in : Horror, Thriller, 4 stars, Mystery, 2010s, 2012 , add a comment

I’ve had no intention on quitting FilmJournal, as I noted back when I started the new version of my blog. But it’s becoming increasingly awkward, with the behind-the-scenes difficulties in posting posts and editing pages (I know I’m not the only one who’s experienced this), as well as posting comments (same again), and most recently with the messed-up-ness of my blog (though I seem to be the only one affected?)

So for that reason, I won’t be posting full reviews here for the time being. Instead, I’ll post things like this — essentially, links to the new review on my other blog. Apologies if you prefer FJ, but that’s the way it looks like it needs to be.

Here’s the link:

#52: Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame (2010) July 6, 2012

Posted by badblokebob in : Action, Fantasy, 3 stars, Mystery, world cinema, Historical, 2010s, 2012 , 1 comment so far

aka Di Renjie

Tsui Hark | 123 mins | Blu-ray | 2.35:1 | China & Hong Kong / Mandarin | 12 / PG-13

For the full version of this review, with pretty pictures and everything, please see it on my new blog.

This year’s 52nd film is, in many ways, thanks to DC’s The New 52 (the comic book initiative/publicity stunt that saw DC relaunch their entire universe across a series of 52 new #1 issues, for those who don’t do comics): it got me back into reading regular comics, and featured in multiple titles for several months was a cool-looking advert for the US release of Detective Dee, complete with the attractive review quote, “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon meets Sherlock Holmes, only a lot more fun”. A little research finds it highly recommended in other arenas too: there’s a host of awards nominations and wins, from the Venice Film Festival to the Hong Kong Film Awards; an 81% rating on Rotten Tomatoes; Blu-ray.com furnished the UK BD release with a glowing write-up; Time ranked it the third best film for the whole of 2011 (behind The Artist and Hugo). Even the unreliable film section of the Radio Times saw fit to give it four stars.

All of which hopefully establishes how I found it to be a massive disappointment.

Days before the coronation of China’s first Empress, a high-ranked man is mysteriously burnt alive from the inside out. Then the man charged with investigating the case suffers the same fate. On advice (from who or what I shall mention later), the Empress assigns the case to Detective Dee — who has been in prison for eight years for rebelling against the Empress. Sounds like a good setup, eh? A super detective, at conflict with his employer, looking into supernaturally-tinged murders; and it’s a Hong Kong movie so you know there’s going to be some impressive action sequences.

To take Time’s opinion as a starting point, I have to wonder if they would rank Detective Dee so highly if it had been an American-produced film with actors speaking English. I don’t mean if the film was Americanised, but exactly the same, just an American production. In that instance, I think it would very much be viewed as a summer blockbuster, because that’s definitely what it strikes me as. It’s one with lots of talky bits and an over-complicated story, certainly, but then it’s not unheard of for US blockbusters to confuddle the viewer with an under-written over-developed plot (less so these days, I grant you).

Apparently it makes commentary on the economic and political situation in modern China. It must be done quite subtly, then. That’s a good thing I suppose, but I imagine you’re only going to notice it if you already have a familiarity with what’s going on. I don’t. Best I can tell, the film’s message is, “even if you think you’re ruler’s a bad person who’s done bad things, they’re you’re ruler and you should let them get on with it and not rebel”. I could have misread it, of course, but that’s what I got from the ending. Not a position I’d personally agree with.

Naturally there are plenty of action sequences (choreographed by Sammo Hung), several of them tacked on for the sake of it. Personally I wasn’t impressed. They’re all clearly shot on digital video (the whole film was, but the smeary fights really show it up), several are under-lit, there’s too much Hollywood-style choppy editing, it felt like some had bits missing, others are stop-start in a way that adds up to not very much… Many of them left me confused about what was meant to be going on, not in awe of the performer’s abilities or entertained. One of them features the hero fighting a gaggle of cheap CGI deer. Yes, deer. Why?

Detective Dee is a film of moments. There are some pretty shots, occasionally even sequences; the fight in the Phantom Bazaar, an underground river network, is guilty of some of my criticisms but also pulls off a few nice bits. The CGI is what you’d expect from a mid-range US miniseries, but (with exceptions such as the fighting deer) it works well enough, even creating some dramatic vistas, particularly of the 200-foot tall Buddha statue that’s central to the plot. Some of the sets are also incredibly impressive — again, the interior of the Buddha. Occasionally I was frustrated reading the subtitles (which fly by at a rate of knots, it felt to me) because I wanted to look at the detailed, busy production design.

I mention the fast subtitles because the film feels like it’s moving at quite a lick. There’s little room to get to know the characters, or the situation, or their relationships, or their political machinations, before it’s racing on to the next plot point. And yet despite that it feels incredibly slow as a whole — I was clock-watching before the hour mark.

Perhaps one of the things that suffers for this is the film’s relationship with the supernatural. It’s at first supposed that the deaths are some kind of divine intervention, but then this is kicked away — what a silly idea by some foolish characters! But then everyone’s more than happy to accept a talking magic deer (seriously; and they happily take it’s advice (see second paragraph)), a fighter whose arms fly off and turn into… something else (choppy editing means I’m not sure), facial transfiguration (imagine Mission: Impossible’s masks with face-churning magic instead of masks), and so on and so forth. Some of it ultimately has a rational explanation, but why is “divine intervention” so much less believable than “magic”? And why do you have to explain the talking deer and flying arms when the face-churning-thing is left untouched? I can take people flying unrealistically through the air — that’s the style of the genre, much like regular folk breaking out into perfectly-pitched musically-accompanied song is the style of the musical — but not internal inconsistency in other areas.

I’ve avoided the comparison so far, but Detective Dee is like a Chinese version of Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes, only a less inventive and comprehensible one. And it’s certainly not “a lot more fun”. Dee is a great deducer, a la Holmes, though the film gives him no opportunities to significantly show that off. The plot concerns a series of apparently-supernatural murders that actually have a rational explanation, and are ultimately all about taking control of the country. It stars a period detective who’s been reconfigured as younger and a man of action. But whereas Holmes kept things clear-cut and fast-moving, Dee (as I’ve noted) fudges and obscures motivation and plot and feels tediously long.

There are actually quite a few little things to like about Dee, and maybe there are a few big things too, but I feel like it’s making you work for them — you could enjoy the characters, or the political machinations, but only if you take time to study them slowly and work out what was going on for yourself, because the film’s in too much of a rush to explain it to you. There’s something to be said for entertainment not spelling everything out — it’s often a highly-praised element of anything that achieves it — but Dee doesn’t do that, it rushes headlong past things that could do with more clarity. (One thing I should do is listen to Bey Logan’s commentary — there’s a fair chance he’ll have insights that illuminate me. But in a moment you’ll see why I haven’t done that before posting this.)

Believe it or not, I didn’t hate Detective Dee… but I didn’t exactly enjoy it either. Not fully. I started this review by saying it and I think it’s my key feeling: after getting a little hyped up about something I’d previously ignored the UK release of, I found it to be disappointing. Your mileage mary vary.

3 out of 5

The UK TV premiere of Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame is on Film4 and Film4 HD tonight, Friday 6th July, at 11:10pm.

Mess…? July 5, 2012

Posted by badblokebob in : Editorials, 2012 , add a comment

Is it just me who’s seeing 100 Films like this right now?

If you’re seeing it too, and want a version of the site that’s a bit more pleasing to the eye, may I cordially remind you about my simul-blog. It has extra pictures and everything. I really ought to get round to doing something with the main page header image though…

Login     Film Journal Home     Support Forums           Journal Rating: 4/5 (9)